The recently released Jasmine 2.0 removes the waits functions and the runs()
from the Async Jasmine 1.3.
I have old 1.3 tests I'd like to transition to the new style.
For the waits, in most cases it seems like you can write beforeEach()
and afterEach()
carefully for the same effect.
What is the best way to reproduce the runs()
which simply executes the contained functions sequentially?
My first try:
runs(function() {
expect(true).toBe(true);
}
becomes
(function() {
expect(true).toBe(true);
})()
It is possible to use a setTimeout in your it() block.
it("is asynchronous", function(done) {
var isItDone = false;
$.ajax('/some/url').success(function() { isItDone = true; });
setTimeout(function(){
expect(isItDone).toBeTrue();
done(); // call this to finish off the it block
}, 500);
});
However, I found that that slowed down my test suite dramatically so I created my own extension which recreates the polling functionality that waitsFor provided.
https://gist.github.com/abreckner/110e28897d42126a3bb9
In jasmine 1.3 and previous, the runs
and waits
/waitsFor
should have only been necessary if you had some asynchronous code that you needed to wait until it was done before doing the next part of the test. In that case you would have something like:
it("is asynchronous", function() {
var isItDone = false;
runs(function() {
$.ajax('/some/url').success(function() { isItDone = true; });
});
waitsFor(function() {
return isItDone;
});
runs(function() {
// this won't run until the waitsFor returns true
});
});
Jasmine 2.0 moved to using a done
callback for beforeEach
, it
, and afterEach
if they do something asynchronous that you need to wait for.
beforeEach(function(done) {
$.ajax('/some/url').success(done);
});
it("is asynchronous", function() {
// this won't run until the done callback is invoked from the beforeEach
});
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With