Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

I've caught an exception!! Now what?

People also ask

What happens if exception in catch?

Answer: When an exception is thrown in the catch block, then the program will stop the execution. In case the program has to continue, then there has to be a separate try-catch block to handle the exception raised in the catch block.

What happens when you don't handle an exception?

When an exception occurred, if you don't handle it, the program terminates abruptly and the code past the line that caused the exception will not get executed.

Should I throw or catch exception?

You generally throws an exception when you want to notify the caller of the method of some failures. Show activity on this post. As others have said, as a general rule, you should catch an exception when you can actually handle it, otherwise, just throw it.


Rule of thumb for exception handling--If you don't know what to do with it, don't catch it.

Corollary to the rule of thumb for exception handling--Handle exceptions at the last responsible moment. If you don't know if this is the last responsible moment, it isn't.


What do you want to do? It depends entirely on your application.

You could have it retry, you could display a message box to the screen, write to a log, the possibilities are endless.

As a developer, you can't predict every possible error. It's a good idea to have a generic catch code in even if you don't know how to fix the error. You could be saving to a database, and one of 50 database errors might occur, and you won't be able to write code to handle every single one.

You should put a generic catch in to make sure your program doesn't simply crash, and in some cases simply displaying the error and letting them have another go is enough. Imagine if the cause was 'disk is full'. You could merely print out the exception, and let the user try again - they'd know what to do, and solve the problem themselves.

This is why I disagree with the comment about not handling it if you don't know what to do. You should always handle it, even if it is just to display a message box saying 'Error' because it's infinitely better than "This program has performed an illegal operation and will be closed."


It depends on your business logic, but you may want to do one or more of the following.

  • Rollback your transaction
  • Log the error
  • Alert any user of the application
  • Retry the operation
  • Rethrow the exception

You may also wish to check if the exception is of a type you can handle before one of the above.

A good article on VB.NET exception handling is Exception Handling in VB.NET by Rajesh VS.


I see a lot of recommendations not to catch it if you don't know what to do with it. That's only sort of right. You should be catching exceptions, but maybe not at this level. Using your code for an example, I'd write it more like this:

Using connection As New SqlConnection("connection string here"), _
      sqlCmd As New SqlCommand("do some SQL", connection), _
      sqlDa As New SqlDataAdapter(sqlCmd)

    sqlDa.Fill(dt)
End Using

Not only is there no Try/Catch/Finally, there's no open or close. The .Fill() function is documented as opening the connection if required, and the Using block will make absolutely certain it's closed correctly, even if an exception is thrown.

This leaves you free to catch exceptions at a higher level — in the UI or business code then calls the function where your query runs, rather than right here at the query itself. This higher-level code is in a much better position to make decisions about how to proceed, what logging needs to happen or show a better error message to the user.

In fact, it's this ability for exceptions to "bubble up" in your code that makes them so valuable. If you always catch an exception right there where it's thrown, then exceptions aren't adding much value beyond the vb's old "On Error Goto X" syntax.