I have two lists list1
and list2
of numbers, and I want to iterate over them with the same instructions. Like this:
for item in list1: print(item.amount) print(item.total_amount) for item in list2: print(item.amount) print(item.total_amount)
But that feels redundant. I know I can write for item in list1 + list2:
, but it has a price of running-time.
Is there a way do that without loose time?
Use the izip() Function to Iterate Over Two Lists in Python It iterates over the lists until the smallest of them gets exhausted. It then zips or maps the elements of both lists together and returns an iterator object. It returns the elements of both lists mapped together according to their index.
Iterating over a list can also be achieved using a while loop. The block of code inside the loop executes until the condition is true. A loop variable can be used as an index to access each element.
This can be done with itertools.chain
:
import itertools l1 = [1, 2, 3, 4] l2 = [5, 6, 7, 8] for i in itertools.chain(l1, l2): print(i, end=" ")
Which will print:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
As per the documentation, chain
does the following:
Make an iterator that returns elements from the first iterable until it is exhausted, then proceeds to the next iterable, until all of the iterables are exhausted.
If you have your lists in a list, itertools.chain.from_iterable
is available:
l = [l1, l2] for i in itertools.chain.from_iterable(l): print(i, end=" ")
Which yields the same result.
If you don't want to import a module for this, writing a function for it is pretty straight-forward:
def custom_chain(*it): for iterab in it: yield from iterab
This requires Python 3, for Python 2, just yield
them back using a loop:
def custom_chain(*it): for iterab in it: for val in iterab: yield val
In addition to the previous, Python 3.5
with its extended unpacking generalizations, also allows unpacking in the list literal:
for i in [*l1, *l2]: print(i, end=" ")
though this is slightly faster than l1 + l2
it still constructs a list which is then tossed; only go for it as a final solution.
chain
works, but if you feel that it's overkill to import a module just to call a single function once, you can replicate its behavior inline:
for seq in (list1, list2): for item in seq: print(item.amount) print(item.total_amount)
Creating the (list1, list2) tuple is O(1) with respect to list length, so it should perform favorably in comparison to concatenating the lists together.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With