I want to define the following class as such:
public class CollectionAttribute<E extends Collection<T>> {
private String name;
private E value;
public CollectionAttribute(String name, E value) {
this.name = name;
this.value = value;
}
public E getValue() { return value; }
public void addValue(T value) { value.add(T); }
}
This won't compile (cannot resolve symbol T
). If I replace the class declaration with the following:
public class CollectionAttribute<E extends Collection<?>>
Then I can't reference the parametrized type of the collection.
Am I missing something or have I reached a limitation with generics in Java ?
You need to add a second generic parameter for T:
public class CollectionAttribute<T, E extends Collection<T>> {
private String name;
private E values;
public CollectionAttribute(String name, E values) {
this.name = name;
this.values = values;
}
public E getValue() { return value; }
public void addValue(T value) { values.add(value); }
}
As Nathan pointed out, you also can't write value.add(T)
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With