Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Is there anyway to use C# implicit operators from F#?

If I have a C# class with implicit conversion to double, like so:

public class Parameter
{
    private double _value;
    public Parameter(double value) { _value = value }
    public static implicit operator double(Parameter p) { return _value; }
}

F# doesn't like me trying to use it as if it were a float:

let a = Parameter(4.0)
let b = Parameter(2.0)
let c = a * Math.Sin(b) <-- 'expected float, here Parameter'

Is there any way to do this (I'm guessing there isn't, based on this question/answer), and if not, what would be a decent workaround?

like image 491
Benjol Avatar asked May 23 '12 12:05

Benjol


People also ask

Does anybody still use C?

The C programming language will turn fifty years old in 2022. Yet despite its long history, C remains one of the top "most-used" programming languages in many "popular programming languages" surveys. For example, check out the TIOBE Index, which tracks the popularity of different programming languages.

Is C ever used?

C exists everywhere in the modern world. A lot of applications, including Microsoft Windows, run on C. Even Python, one of the most popular languages, was built on C. Modern applications add new features implemented using high-level languages, but a lot of their existing functionalities use C.

Is C used anywhere?

Use of C and Key Applications. C is one of the oldest and most fundamental programming languages, and it is extensively used all over the world. C is a fast, portable language with a large library. It is a middle-level language with the advantages of both low-level and high-level languages.

Will C be used in the future?

Later, the C programming language was used to develop Microsoft Windows and a variety of Android applications. In future C can be used to make better operating systems for more user-friendly apps.


3 Answers

F# does not perform implicit conversions, but it allows you to define an explicit operator to run them. See the kvb's answer to a previous question:

let inline (!>) (x:^a) : ^b = ((^a or ^b) : (static member op_Implicit : ^a -> ^b) x) 

This is using statically resolved type parameters to say that either the input or the result needs to provide implicit conversion operator - these are compiled to methods named op_Implicit, so the F# compiler checks for a static method with this special name.

Using the !> operator, you can now explicitly say where you want to convert Parameter to a float (two times) in your code sample like this:

let a = Parameter(4.0) 
let b = Parameter(2.0) 
let c = !> a * Math.Sin(!> b)

I think the main reason for not allowing implicit conversions in F# is that it would make the type inference a bit more difficult and it would be hard for the compiler to give good error messages.

like image 108
Tomas Petricek Avatar answered Nov 13 '22 12:11

Tomas Petricek


It won't let you do implicit conversions. Make your conversions explicit where you need to.

See here for various ways to do it explicitly: http://natehoellein.blogspot.com/2008/02/basic-type-conversions-with-f.html

like image 27
jlew Avatar answered Nov 13 '22 12:11

jlew


FSharp.Interop.Dynamic uses the DLR, so for most people probably overkill, but has a function Dyn.implicitConvert for dynamically using the C# implicit operator.

   [<Test>] member basic.``Test Implicit Conversion`` ()=
                    let ele = 50
                    ele |> Dyn.implicitConvert |> should equal (decimal 50)
like image 1
jbtule Avatar answered Nov 13 '22 14:11

jbtule