All the reasons I can find for using Fragments in Android activities have to do with having the ability to display multiple classes/view in the same screen, encapsulating multiple logical components, etc.
Considering all this, it seems, fragments are only actually useful when you employ the use of many of them.
Is that so? Is there ever a point of using just one fragment in an activity?
I ask now because I saw an option on Android Studio to do just that, and I am wondering what the point is.
Fragment cannot be used without an Activity. While Using fragments in the project, the project structure will be good and we can handle it easily. Lifecycle methods are hosted by OS. The activity has its own life cycle.
Fragments introduce modularity and reusability into your activity's UI by allowing you to divide the UI into discrete chunks. Activities are an ideal place to put global elements around your app's user interface, such as a navigation drawer.
You can use a Fragment in more than one Activity . One Activity can have multiple fragments. After you define a Fragment in a Kotlin class, the fragment is automatically added to the activity_main.
Fragments are Android's solution to creating reusable user interfaces. You can achieve some of the same things using activities and layouts (for example by using includes). However; fragments are wired in to the Android API, from HoneyComb, and up.
Out of my personal opinion, I would say yes.
For the following reasons:
According to google coding guidelines, it is best practice to create as few Activities as possible, and create multiple Fragments instead that are switched inside an Activity.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With