I have many methods like the one below:
void ValidateBuyerRules()
{
var nodesWithRules = ActiveNodes.Where(x => x.RuleClass.IsNotNullOrEmpty());
**if (!nodesWithRules.Any()) return;**
foreach (var ruleClass in nodesWithRules)
{
// Do something here
}
}
As you can see, I check if nodesWithRules has any items and exit the method before conducting the foreach statement, but is this unecessary code?
LINQ syntax is typically less efficient than a foreach loop. It's good to be aware of any performance tradeoff that might occur when you use LINQ to improve the readability of your code.
The forloop is faster than the foreach loop if the array must only be accessed once per iteration.
No, LINQ iterators are not and will never be faster than foreach .
Difference between for loop and foreach loop:for loop executes a statement or a block of statement until the given condition is false. Whereas foreach loop executes a statement or a block of statements for each element present in the array and there is no need to define the minimum or maximum limit.
Unless you have some logic after the foreach
statement that you want to avoid, that's unnecessary as it will work the same.
When foreach
iterates over nodesWithRules
detects that there are no items and exit the loop.
If this is linq 2 sql, never do that.
You cause an extra round trip.
Also if you have any other type of IEnumerable, you should avoid that. .net does some tricks for underlying list, but you shouldn't rely on those.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With