Is there an effective way to use generics in a throws clause?

Question

According to Cannot Create, Catch, or Throw Objects of Parameterized Types (Java Tutorials):

You can, however, use a type parameter in a throws clause:

class Parser<T extends Exception> {
    public void parse(File file) throws T {     // OK
        // ...
    }
}

But why would you want to? You can't construct T here. If you inject T after building it outside, isn't its stack trace going to be all wrong? Were they simply documenting a feature that happened to work regardless of it's usefulness?

Answer 1

Why not

class FooParser extends Parser<FooException> {
    public void parse(File file) throws FooException {
        throw new FooException("Not Supported");
    }
}