I'm trying to write an extension method that will add the function HasFactor
to the class int
in C#. This works wonderfully, like so:
static class ExtendInt
{
public static bool HasFactor(this int source, int factor)
{
return (source % factor == 0);
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
int i = 50;
int f = 2;
bool b = i.HasFactor(f);
Console.WriteLine("Is {0} a factor of {1}? {2}",f,i,b);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
This works great because variable i
in the Main()
method above is declared as an int
. However, if i
is declared as an Int16
or an Int64
, the extension method does not show up unless it is explicitly cast as an int
or Int32
.
I now would like to apply the same HasFactor
method to Int16
and Int64
. However, I'd rather not write separate extension methods for each type of int
. I could write a single method for Int64
and then explicitly cast everything as an Int64
or long
in order for the extension method to appear.
Ideally, I'd prefer to have the same extension method apply to all three types without having to copy and paste a lot of code.
Is this even possible in C#? If not, is there a recommended best-practice for this type of situation?
The only difference between a regular static method and an extension method is that the first parameter of the extension method specifies the type that it is going to operator on, preceded by the this keyword.
An extension method must be a static method. An extension method must be inside a static class -- the class can have any name. The parameter in an extension method should always have the "this" keyword preceding the type on which the method needs to be called.
Extension methods enable you to "add" methods to existing types without creating a new derived type, recompiling, or otherwise modifying the original type. Extension methods are static methods, but they're called as if they were instance methods on the extended type.
No. Extension methods require an instance variable (value) for an object. You can however, write a static wrapper around the ConfigurationManager interface. If you implement the wrapper, you don't need an extension method since you can just add the method directly.
No, this is not possible in C#. You'll have to create one extension method for each type. The closest is to have an extension method that operates on an interface, but in this case there is no INumeric interface or anything similar that is implemented by the various numeric types.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With