In c++98, the following program is expected to call the copy constructor.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class A
{
public:
A() { cout << "default" ; }
A(int i) { cout << "int" ; }
A(const A& a) { cout << "copy"; }
};
int main ()
{
A a1;
A a2(0);
A a3 = 0;
return 0;
}
That is evident if you declare the copy constructor explicit in above case (the compiler errors out). But I don't I see the output of copy constructor when it is not declared as explicit. I guess that is because of copy elision. Is there any way to disable copy elision or does the standard mandates it?
Pre C++ 17
A a3 = 0;
will call copy constructor unless copy is elided. Pass -fno-elide-constructors
flag
from C++17
, copy elision is guaranteed. So you will not see copy constructor getting called.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With