Is there a Unicode character to describe a relationship involving a dependency?

Question

Many ASCII and Unicode characters signify relationships:

• > is greater than
• < is less than
• = is equal to
• ≠ is not equal to
• ∈ is a member of
• ∉ is not a member of

Is there a character (which I can use in documentation or comments to describe code architecture in javascript or PHP) which signifies relies on dependency?

• x [relies on dependency] y

The closest thing I have come up with is:

• ∋ [U+220B] (ie. contains or contains as member)

Can I employ the following notation

• x ∋ y

and it will describe x relies on the dependency y?

Do either javascript or PHP (or lower level programming languages) have a more specific notation for describing when one script always depends on (or includes) another modular script?

---

Update 1

I have now also found the double turnstile:

• ⊨ [U+22A8] (ie. entails)

(See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_turnstile)

I think ∋ and ⊨ are both reasonable candidates but neither convey precisely the relationship I am looking to describe.

---

Update 2

I have come across another symbol called two joined squares:

• ⧉ [U+29C9] (two joined squares)

I have been unable (so far) to determine the meaning of this symbol, though, pictorially, at least, it does suggest the kind of relationship I am looking to describe - that is, the upper left square incorporates part of the lower right square.

---

Update 3

Returning to this question after nearly two and half years...

There is a mathematical symbol featuring two concentric circles:

• ⊚ [U+229A] (Circled Ring Operator)

which no-one seems to know the meaning of, but which might suitably convey a module contained within another module (and imply that either the former is a dependency of the latter or vice versa).

Two points:

• ⊚ [U+229A] is not the better-known Bullseye (◎) [U+25CE], though perhaps either would do

• other circular symbols which display another shape within the circle include:

  • ⊙ [U+2299]
  • ⦿ [U+29BF]
  • ◔ [U+25D4]

Answer 1

I am 3.5 years too late...but why don't you use "succeed" (≻) or "preceed" (≺)?

So "C" ≺ "D" means "C" preceeds "D", or "C" comes before "D". "D" cannot exist without "C".

Answer 2

I don't know if I fully understand "calls on the dependency*" concept...

In mathematics, we have these relations:

A ⇒ B is like saying "A implies B" or "B follows from A".

A ∵ B is like saying "A is true because B is true".

A ∴ B is like saying "Because A is true, therefore B is true".

But I am afraid they are not exactly the answer you ask for...