Is there a legitimate use for void*?

Question

Is there a legitimate use of void* in C++? Or was this introduced because C had it?

Just to recap my thoughts:

Input: If we want to allow multiple input types we can overload functions and methods, alternatively we can define a common base class, or template (thanks for mentioning this in the answers). In both cases the code get's more descriptive and less error prone (provided the base class is implemented in a sane way).

Output: I can't think of any situation where I would prefer to receive void* as opposed to something derived from a known base class.

Just to make it clear what I mean: I'm not specifically asking if there is a use-case for void*, but if there is a case where void* is the best or only available choice. Which has been perfectly answered by several people below.

Answer 1

void* is at least necessary as the result of ::operator new (also every operator new...) and of malloc and as the argument of the placement new operator.

void* can be thought as the common supertype of every pointer type. So it is not exactly meaning pointer to void, but pointer to anything.

BTW, if you wanted to keep some data for several unrelated global variables, you might use some std::map<void*,int> score; then, after having declared global int x; and double y; and std::string s; do score[&x]=1; and score[&y]=2; and score[&z]=3;

memset wants a void* address (the most generic ones)

Also, POSIX systems have dlsym and its return type evidently should be void*