There's this error in Python when calling builtin type()
with no arguments:
TypeError: type() takes 1 or 3 arguments
How can we define such a method? Is there a builtin way? Or we need to do something like this:
>>> def one_or_three(*args):
... if len(args) not in [1,3]:
... raise TypeError("one_or_three() takes 1 or 3 arguments")
...
>>> one_or_three(1)
>>> one_or_three()
TypeError: one_or_three() takes 1 or 3 arguments
>>> one_or_three(1,2)
TypeError: one_or_three() takes 1 or 3 arguments
The * symbol is used to pass a variable number of arguments to a function. Typically, this syntax is used to avoid the code failing when we don't know how many arguments will be sent to the function.
In Python, there are two ways to define a function that can take a variable number of arguments. Different forms of this type are: Positional arguments. Keyword arguments.
Except for functions with variable-length argument lists, the number of arguments in a function call must be the same as the number of parameters in the function definition. This number can be zero. The maximum number of arguments (and corresponding parameters) is 253 for a single function.
The syntax for calling a Python function is as follows: <function_name>([<arguments>]) <arguments> are the values passed into the function. They correspond to the <parameters> in the Python function definition. You can define a function that doesn't take any arguments, but the parentheses are still required.
Related Studylists PythonHResearch work Preview text Example 1: Define a function that takes an argument. Call the function. Identify what code is the argument and what code is the parameter. def hello(name): print(“Hi,”,name) This function is used as follows. > hello(“John”) Hi, John In this case, the argument is John.
Define a function that takes an argument. Call the function. Identify what code is the argument and what code is the parameter Create your own Python code examples that demonstrate each of the following. Do not copy examples from the book or any other source. Try to be creative with your examples to demonstrate that you invented them yourself.
This function, called introduction, has one argument, name. The body of this function includes only one line, which prints out the message, including the name. We have also added a comment explaining the purpose of our function.
Builtin functions are part of the Python language. They are provided to be used in our Python programs. For example, print () function in Python is used to display some output message to the user on the screen. For example, print (‘hello World’) will show a message Hello World on the screen.
First, type is not native Python (at least in CPython), but C.
The inspect
module can confirm it easily (even if documented as a builtin function, type
is implemented as a class in CPython):
>>> print(inspect.signature(type.__init__))
(self, /, *args, **kwargs)
>>> print(sig.parameters['self'].kind)
POSITIONAL_ONLY
The parameter kind is POSITIONAL_ONLY
, which cannot be created in Python.
That means that it will not be possible to reproduce exactly the behaviour of type.
Python source allows only 2 signatures for variable number of arguments:
3 parameters, 2 of them being optional:
type(object_or_name, bases = None, dict = None)
This would be very different, because it will accept gladly type(obj, None)
which is definitely not what is expected here
a simple *args
parameter whose length will be tested by hand - your proposal. This will be much closer to native type
behaviour, because it really requires 1 or 3 parameters, whatever the values.
TL/DR: the answer to your question is that we really need the something like that way.
This behavior is perfectly possible in Python.
def one_or_three(one, two=object(), three=object()):
two_sentinel, three_sentinel = one_or_three.__defaults__
if (two == two_sentinel) != (three == three_sentinel):
raise TypeError("one_or_three() takes 1 or 3 arguments")
...
This has the benefits of named arguments (semantic value, passing in by name, etc) but is basically a variation on checking the values of some variables to know whether one or three things were passed.
Note that the two calls to object()
produce two different objects and bind them to the function:
>>> one_or_three.__defaults__
(<object object at 0x00168540>, <object object at 0x00168ED0>)
This way, they are globally unique. If you instead used None
as your sentinel object, then it wouldn't be possible to pass in None
as an argument (though of course that may be desired).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With