I've noticed that there are several uses of pd.DataFrame.groupby
followed by an apply
implicitly assuming that groupby
is stable - that is, if a and b are instances of the same group, and pre-grouping, a appeared before b, then a will appear pre b following the grouping as well.
I think there are several answers clearly implicitly using this, but, to be concrete, here is one using groupby
+cumsum
.
Is there anything actually promising this behavior? The documentation only states:
Group series using mapper (dict or key function, apply given function to group, return result as series) or by a series of columns.
Also, pandas having indices, the functionality could be theoretically be achieved also without this guarantee (albeit in a more cumbersome way).
Groupby preserves the order of rows within each group. When calling apply, add group keys to index to identify pieces. Reduce the dimensionality of the return type if possible, otherwise return a consistent type.
The Groupby Rolling function does not preserve the original index and so when dates are the same within the Group, it is impossible to know which index value it pertains to from the original dataframe.
Pandas groupby is used for grouping the data according to the categories and apply a function to the categories. It also helps to aggregate data efficiently. Pandas dataframe. groupby() function is used to split the data into groups based on some criteria.
What is the difference between the pivot_table and the groupby? The groupby method is generally enough for two-dimensional operations, but pivot_table is used for multi-dimensional grouping operations.
Yes; the description of the sort
parameter of DataFrame.groupby
now promises that groupby
(with or without key sorting) "preserves the order of rows within each group":
sort : bool, default True
Sort group keys. Get better performance by turning this off. Note this does not influence the order of observations within each group. Groupby preserves the order of rows within each group.
Although the docs don't state this internally, it uses stable sort when generating the groups.
See:
As I mentioned in the comments, this is important if you consider transform
which will return a Series with it's index aligned to the original df. If the sorting didn't preserve the order, then this would make alignment perform additional work as it would need to sort the Series prior to assigning. In fact, this is mentioned in the comments:
_algos.groupsort_indexer
implements counting sort and it is at leastO(ngroups)
, where
ngroups = prod(shape)
shape = map(len, keys)
That is, linear in the number of combinations (cartesian product) of unique values of groupby keys. This can be huge when doing multi-key groupby.
np.argsort(kind='mergesort')
isO(count x log(count))
where count is the length of the data-frame; Both algorithms are stable sort and that is necessary for correctness of groupby operations.e.g. consider:
df.groupby(key)[col].transform('first')
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With