Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

{} || [] is not valid JavaScript [duplicate]

Why is {} || [] not valid?

$ echo '[] || {}' | node # this works
$ echo '{} || []' | node # but this doesn't
[stdin]:1
{} || []
   ^^

SyntaxError: Unexpected token ||
    at createScript (vm.js:80:10)
    at Object.runInThisContext (vm.js:139:10)
    at Object.<anonymous> ([stdin]-wrapper:6:22)
    at Module._compile (module.js:652:30)
    at evalScript (bootstrap_node.js:466:27)
    at Socket.<anonymous> (bootstrap_node.js:237:15)
    at emitNone (events.js:111:20)
    at Socket.emit (events.js:208:7)
    at endReadableNT (_stream_readable.js:1064:12)
    at _combinedTickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:138:11)

$ echo '({}) || []' | node # unless you do this
like image 704
charmoniumQ Avatar asked Sep 21 '18 18:09

charmoniumQ


People also ask

Why {} == {} is false in JavaScript?

javascript compares objects by identity, not value. Each object, each {} is distinct.

Why [] == [] is false?

Because [] creates a new array, so you are comparing one array object with another array object. It's not the contents of the arrays that is compared, the object references are compared. They are not equal because it's not the same object instance.

When there is a problem with JavaScript code there are generally two types of errors?

Namely, with JavaScript, most of our errors fit into two categories: syntax errors and runtime errors. A syntax error is a problem with the grammar in our code. Syntax errors mostly come in the form of misspelled keywords, missing or open brackets, or missing parentheses or punctuation.

What is the problem with JavaScript?

These days, most cross-browser JavaScript problems are seen: When poor-quality browser-sniffing code, feature-detection code, and vendor prefix usage block browsers from running code they could otherwise use just fine. When developers make use of new/nascent JavaScript features, modern Web APIs, etc.)


1 Answers

When a statement starts with {, it's assumed by the parser to be the beginning of a block statement. In the case of {}, it's an empty block statement. So it's as if you had

{
  // no code here
}
|| []

and || cannot start a statement.

The one that does work, [] || {}, is unambiguous because a statement whose first token is [ can only be an expression statement.

Wrapping {} in ( ) means that the first token of the statement is (, not {. The ( token cannot start any form of statement other than an expression (though it does have a little ambiguity, since it can start an anonymous "fat arrow" function; that's still an expression and the parser just has to disambiguate that later).

Note: the implementation of various debugging environments like your browser console and the Node command-line "console" have an effect on this sort of syntax. In order to keep things simple, such tools take the code you type in and one way or another they "wrap" it so that it can be parsed and evaluated interactively, statement by statement as you type. Unfortunately that process can introduce anomalies, such that something you try in the console may work fine there but not when you try it in a real block of code.

like image 55
Pointy Avatar answered Oct 18 '22 01:10

Pointy