Menu
I have heard that the developers of "jBPM" have transferred to "Activiti BPMN 2" in recent times (ex: Tom).
I am wondering about is whether the support for jBPM will be over or not.. Besides, I would be glad to hear your ideas about if the improvements of Activiti BPMN will make it better or useful than jBPM as time goes on?
I would also like to know what are the pros/cons between them.
593
Activiti is an Apache-licensed business process management (BPM) engine. Such an engine has as core goal to take a process definition comprised of human tasks and service calls and execute those in a certain order, while exposing various API's to start, manage and query data about process instances for that definition.
Camunda split from the Activiti project in 2013. Since then, we maintained our own open source fork of the original Activiti Codebase.
Activiti is an interesting project for several reasons:
They intend to commoditize the engine. For that reason they use the Apache Software License. So far several companies are backing that project. The "business model" is somewhat similar to that used by OpenStack.
It makes sense to have one BPMN 2.0 engine which is used and can be used by everybody. This does include jBoss (but I doubt that they will switch soon).
163
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
