Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Is it recommended to use Database as a container in Production environment?

Tags:

Assuming we are using a micro service architecture for a product and we decide to use 'Database per service' model, and deploy in cloud servers by provider like AWS. It is convenient to have databases running as a container for development and test environments.

But can same be implemented for Production environment! If so, how safe it would be? Or is it proper to go with cloud solution as AWS RDS-DB instead!!

like image 913
Shruthi Bhaskar Avatar asked Jan 30 '18 06:01

Shruthi Bhaskar


People also ask

Should I use a database in a container?

If you're working on a small project, and are deploying to a single machine, it's completely okay to run your database in a Docker container. Be sure to mount a volume to make the data persistent, and have backup processes in place. Try to restore them every once in a while to make sure your backups are any good.

Why database should not be containerized?

Individual containers can spin up and down on-demand, so the applications can't be designed to run continuously and remember what they're working on. If a containerized application has a built-in database, that database disappears when the container shuts down and is recreated from scratch when it boots back up again.

Is it recommended to use Docker for database?

In general, Docker is not designed for stateful services, so it is not highly recommended to run a database in a docker container in a production environment.

Is Container same as database?

A collection (the most common name for an object/value container) usually stores objects/values in memory while a database persists information to a disk drive, storing it until it's removed.


2 Answers

This blog post lists some reasons why you should not run production databases in containers. It also references another blog post describing problems with updating docker and unstable storage drivers.

The main points here for me boil down to this:

  • Dodgy storage drivers. This may be less of a problem when you write your database state to the host system but Docker for example explicitly encourages users to use volumes for exactly that (see the docs: Citation: "Volumes are the best way to persist data in Docker"). It may just work fine under normal circumstances, but what about the edge-cases like power-failures or read-errors for example?

  • Managing databases in production is hard. Many companies employ full-time DBAs to ensure smooth operation of production databases. The devops paradigm (every dev creates a plethora of DB servers in containers) makes it nearly impossible for a DBA to do his job. That is if the DBA even has access to these DBs.

In conclusion: Containers are fine for certain tasks and a bad idea for others. Running production databases in containers is one of those bad ideas.

like image 55
Richard Avatar answered Sep 24 '22 17:09

Richard


We containerise our db in production (on-premises enterprise application). Many do. It's perfectly stable and the deployment is much simplified. Of course our db is not under stress; we're dealing with hundreds of concurrent users, not tens of thousands. We just make sure that the container has enough RAM and is monitored well.

If we did need to dedicate an entire VM to the db alone, then yes I would skip docker.

like image 42
Bernard Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 17:09

Bernard