My question is very simple. If I have a class in ES6 is it possible to use an arrow function within it?
import React, { Component } from 'react';
export default class SearchForm extends Component {
state = {
searchText: ''
}
onSearchChange = e => {
this.setState({ searchText: e.target.value });
}
handleSubmit = e => {
e.preventDefault();
this.props.onSearch(this.query.value);
e.currentTarget.reset();
}
render() {
return (
<form className="search-form" onSubmit={this.handleSubmit} >
<label className="is-hidden" htmlFor="search">Search</label>
<input type="search"
onChange={this.onSearchChange}
name="search"
ref={(input) => this.query = input}
placeholder="Search..." />
<button type="submit" id="submit" className="search-button">
<i className="material-icons icn-search">search</i>
</button>
</form>
);
}
}
The reason I ask is that I get an error in my console, even when using Babel. It seems like there's a lot of resources on the internet stating you can do this (most of which are about developing with React).
Is this something that Babel should do, and will eventually become natively supported?
The error I get is an unexpected = sign, just before the parens.
EDIT: I forgot to mention, the reason I wish to do this is to make use of the this
keyword in context of the class. If I use a regular function - to my understanding - I would have to bind this
to the function. I'm trying to look for a nicer way of doing that.
Arrow functions don't have their own bindings to this , arguments or super , and should not be used as methods.
Arrow functions in ES6 have at least two limitations: Don't work with new and cannot be used when creating prototype. Fixed this bound to scope at initialisation.
Arrow functions are introduced in ES6, which provides you a more accurate way to write the functions in JavaScript. They allow us to write smaller function syntax. Arrow functions make your code more readable and structured.
It's a new feature that introduced in ES6 and is called arrow function. The left part denotes the input of a function and the right part the output of that function.
In order to do that, you'll need to add the transform-class-properties
babel plugin, which allows you to have auto-bound class methods like you are attempting.
Unlike what others have just suggested, there IS value in doing this. Namely, your class function automatically has the class this
bound to it, without having to manually bind it in your constructor.
Without the transform-class-properties
plugin, you could do:
export default class SearchForm extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.doSomething = this.doSomething.bind(this)
}
doSomething () {
console.log(this) // <-- 'this' is the class instance
}
}
With the plugin:
export default class SearchForm extends Component {
doSomething = () => {
console.log(this) // <-- 'this' is the class instance, no binding necessary
}
}
Heres and article that explains it (among other thing) fairly well and consisely: https://medium.com/@joshblack/writing-a-react-component-in-es2015-a0b27e1ed50a
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With