I'm working on a simple graphical network application, using asyncio and tkinter. I'm running into the problem of combining the asyncio event loop with Tk's mainloop. If possible, I'd like to do it without threads, because both these libraries (but especially tkinter) aren't very thread safe. Currently, I'm using Tk.update in an asyncio coroutine, which runs only a single iteration of the tk event loop:
@asyncio.coroutine
def run_tk(tk, interval=0.1):
try:
while True:
tk.update()
yield from asyncio.sleep(interval)
except TclError as e:
if "application has been destroyed" not in e.args[0]:
raise
However, in the interest of exploring all options, I was wondering if it was possible to do the reverse- if it was possible to invoke only a single iteration of an asyncio event loop inside a tk callback.
Take a look at this example.
import asyncio
from tkinter import *
class asyncTk(Tk):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.running = True
self.protocol("WM_DELETE_WINDOW", self.on_closing)
def on_closing(self):
self.running = False
self.destroy()
def __await__(self):
while self.running:
self.update()
yield
async def asd():
for x in range(1,10):
await asyncio.sleep(1)
print(x)
async def main():
w = asyncTk()
asyncio.create_task(asd())
await w
asyncio.run(main())
The missing of public method like loop.run_once()
is intentional.
Not every supported event loop has a method to iterate one step. Often underlying API has methods for creating event loop and running it forever but emulating single step may be very ineffective.
If you really need it you may implement single-step iteration easy:
import asyncio
def run_once(loop):
loop.call_soon(loop.stop)
loop.run_forever()
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
for i in range(100):
print('Iteration', i)
run_once(loop)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With