Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Is it possible in ocamllex to define a rule that looks ahead at the next character without consuming it?

Tags:

ocaml

ocamllex

I'm using ocamllex to write a lexer for a scripting language but I am facing a conflict with my rule for comments.

I want to allow my command arguments to be unquoted as long as they only contain alphanumeric characters and slashes "/". For example:

echo "quoted argument !@#%" /this/second/argument/is/unquoted

Additionally, one of my prerequesites is C++ style comments with "//"

//this is a comment
echo hello world

The problem this brings is things like

echo foo//comment

I would like my lexer to produce a "foo" token, while also leaving the "//" untouched, to be consumed in the next time I ask the lexer for token. Is that possible? The reason for this is that its possible that the input buffer might not have reached the end of the comment yet and I'd rather immediately return the "foo" token than needlessly block trying to eagerly consume the comment.

like image 759
hugomg Avatar asked Nov 27 '14 22:11

hugomg


1 Answers

The following is a small lexer which only matches echo, quoted and unquoted strings, comments, and prints out the resulting tokens:

{
  type token = NEWLINE | ECHO | QUOTED of string | UNQUOTED of string | COMMENT of string
  exception Eof

  type state = CODE | LINE_COMMENT
  let state = ref CODE
}

let newline      = '\n'
let alphanum     = [ 'A'-'Z' 'a'-'z' '0'-'9' '_' ] 
let comment_line = "//"([^ '\n' ]+)
let space        = [ ' ' '\t' ]
let quoted       = '"'([^ '"' ]+)'"'
let unquoted     = ('/'?(alphanum+'/'?)+)

rule code = parse
  space+                      { code lexbuf }
| newline                     { code lexbuf }
| "echo"                      { ECHO }
| quoted                      { QUOTED (Lexing.lexeme lexbuf) }
| "//"                        { line_comment "" lexbuf }
| ('/'|alphanum+)             { unquoted (Lexing.lexeme lexbuf) lexbuf }
| eof                         { raise Eof }

and unquoted buff = parse
  newline                     { UNQUOTED buff }
| "//"                        { state := LINE_COMMENT; if buff = "" then line_comment "" lexbuf else UNQUOTED buff }
| ('/'|alphanum+)             { unquoted (buff ^ Lexing.lexeme lexbuf) lexbuf }
| space+                      { UNQUOTED buff }
| eof                         { raise Eof }

and line_comment buff = parse
  newline                     { state := CODE; COMMENT buff }
| _                           { line_comment (buff ^ Lexing.lexeme lexbuf) lexbuf }

{

  let lexer lb =
    match !state with
      CODE -> code lb
    | LINE_COMMENT -> line_comment "" lb

  let _ =
    try
      let lexbuf = Lexing.from_channel stdin in
      while true do
        let () =
          match lexer lexbuf with
            ECHO -> Printf.printf "ECHO\n"
          | QUOTED s -> Printf.printf "QUOTED(%s)\n" s
          | UNQUOTED s -> Printf.printf "UNQUOTED(%s)\n" s
          | COMMENT s -> Printf.printf "COMMENT(%s)\n" s
          | NEWLINE -> Printf.printf "\n"
        in flush stdout
      done
    with Eof -> exit 0

}

It's a trick that I used in a project of mine, to overcome that same limitation in ocamllex (compared to the original C lex program which let one match patterns in "look ahead mode"). Basically, it splits the ambiguous rules in their distinct radicals, and switch the lexer to different parser accordingly. It also keeps track of the currently used parser ad the next entry point.

In your situation, the only states it needs to keep track of are the default one (CODE), and comment mode (LINE_COMMENT). This could be expanded to support other states if needed.

like image 57
didierc Avatar answered Sep 18 '22 14:09

didierc