If I don't need a primary key should I not add one to the database?
A primary key is mainly formally defined to aid referencial Integrity, however if the table is very small, or is unlikely to contain unique data then it's an un-necessary overhead. Defining indexes on the table can normally be used to imply a primary key without formally declaring one.
If you insert a row without specifying the primary key, then SQL will automatically pick one for you that's different from other values. You can also specify AUTOINCREMENT after PRIMARY KEY .
A table cannot have more than one primary key, but it can have multiple unique keys. Primary keys are optional, and can be defined when a table is created or altered. They are also beneficial, because they order the data when data is exported or reorganized.
Yes it does. By default, the primary key constraint is enforced in SQL Server by a unique clustered index. The clustered index defines the logical order of rows in the table.
You do need a primary key. You just don't know that yet.
A primary key uniquely identifies a row in your table.
The fact it's indexed and/or clustered is a physical implementation issue and unrelated to the logical design.
You need one for the table to make sense.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With