Is it guaranteed that False == 0
and True == 1
, in Python (assuming that they are not reassigned by the user)? For instance, is it in any way guaranteed that the following code will always produce the same results, whatever the version of Python (both existing and, likely, future ones)?
0 == False # True 1 == True # True ['zero', 'one'][False] # is 'zero'
Any reference to the official documentation would be much appreciated!
Edit: As noted in many answers, bool
inherits from int
. The question can therefore be recast as: "Does the documentation officially say that programmers can rely on booleans inheriting from integers, with the values 0
and 1
?". This question is relevant for writing robust code that won't fail because of implementation details!
Python assigns boolean values to values of other types. For numerical types like integers and floating-points, zero values are false and non-zero values are true. For strings, empty strings are false and non-empty strings are true.
If you don't know the types of your variables, you may want to refactor your code. But if you really need to be sure it is exactly True and nothing else, use is . Using == will give you 1 == True .
The Python Boolean type is one of Python's built-in data types. It's used to represent the truth value of an expression. For example, the expression 1 <= 2 is True , while the expression 0 == 1 is False . Understanding how Python Boolean values behave is important to programming well in Python.
In numeric contexts (for example when used as the argument to an arithmetic operator), they [False and True] behave like the integers 0 and 1, respectively. So booleans are explicitly considered as integers in Python 2 and 3.
In Python 2.x this is not guaranteed as it is possible for True
and False
to be reassigned. However, even if this happens, boolean True and boolean False are still properly returned for comparisons.
In Python 3.x True
and False
are keywords and will always be equal to 1
and 0
.
Under normal circumstances in Python 2, and always in Python 3:
False
object is of type bool
which is a subclass of int
:
object | int | bool
It is the only reason why in your example, ['zero', 'one'][False]
does work. It would not work with an object which is not a subclass of integer, because list indexing only works with integers, or objects that define a __index__
method (thanks mark-dickinson).
Edit:
It is true of the current python version, and of that of Python 3. The docs for python 2 and the docs for Python 3 both say:
There are two types of integers: [...] Integers (int) [...] Booleans (bool)
and in the boolean subsection:
Booleans: These represent the truth values False and True [...] Boolean values behave like the values 0 and 1, respectively, in almost all contexts, the exception being that when converted to a string, the strings "False" or "True" are returned, respectively.
There is also, for Python 2:
In numeric contexts (for example when used as the argument to an arithmetic operator), they [False and True] behave like the integers 0 and 1, respectively.
So booleans are explicitly considered as integers in Python 2 and 3.
So you're safe until Python 4 comes along. ;-)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With