Menu
I read about small talk being completely object oriented.. is C++ also completely object oriented? if no.. then why so??
865
Master C and Embedded C Programming- Learn as you go Let us see the reason why C++ is not known as completely object oriented language. In C++, we need the main() function to start executing, but in C++, the main functions are not present inside the class. So we can also write code without using class in C++.
KEY DIFFERENCEC is a Procedural Oriented language, whereas C++ is an Object-Oriented Programming language. C supports only Pointers whereas C++ supports both pointers and references. C does not allow you to use function overloading whereas C++ allows you to use function overloading.
C++ is widely considered an object-oriented programming language. Stroustrup developed C++ by adding object-oriented capabilities to the C programming language. When we say that a language is an object-oriented programming language, we often mean that it supports object-oriented programming.
Some of fully object oriented languages are, as follows: JAVA. C# Visual Basic.
No, it isn't. You can write a valid, well-coded, excellently-styled C++ program without using an object even once.
C++ supports object-oriented programming, but OO is not intrinsic to the language. In fact, the main function isn't a member of an object.
In smalltalk or Java, you can't tie your shoes (or write "Hello, world") without at least one class.
(Of course, one can argue about Java being a completely object-oriented language too, because its primitives (say, int) are not objects.)
142
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
