Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Is a gaming machine better for software development? [closed]

Is a gaming machine better for software development?

like image 475
Mark Redman Avatar asked Nov 21 '09 11:11

Mark Redman


2 Answers

NO.

  1. CPU For software development, you need lots of cores. For gaming, you need fast but not necessarily many cores. This is slowly changing as newer games are being written to take advantage of multicore CPUs, but the general case is that most gaming machines focus on raw CPU power. For example, in my case, I'm an RoR developer, and during development I run: my editor, mongrel, solr, postgresql, and memcached. Most of the time I also have an open browser, a PDF editor, and iTunes.

  2. RAM Most games will be OK with 2-3GB of RAM. For software development, especially web development - if you will be running multiple servers - you'll want at least 4GB, or even 8GB of RAM.

  3. GPU Top-of-the-line graphics cards for gaming can cost $500 or more. For software development, you can get away with the cheapest GPU you can get. The only aspect of the video card you'll want to concern yourself with is the capability to handle multiple large monitors.

It will actually be helpful if your development machine is so crippled (gaming-wise) that you can't play the games you like to play on that machine. No distractions! :)

like image 136
Radamanthus Avatar answered Oct 08 '22 21:10

Radamanthus


I would say some aspects are the same between gaming machines and development machines, like large disks, a lot of memory, etc. So in that respect yes, a gaming machine would fit better than a low end desktop.

On the other hand, gaming machines tend to be tuned towards raw performance instead of robustness. A development machine often does not need a state of the art graphics card, nor does it want a RAID-0 to spead up the disk. If it crashes one disk you lose all your work, so RAID-1 would be much better. Same holds for memory, ECC (or what its called nowadays) is a bit slower but adds robustness.

One gotcha with powerful development machines is that they do not represent the non-functional requirements as to execution environment. If you are not aware of this enough your software will run slow on a "normal" machine because it ran great on your supercomputer :-) One take on this is that development machines should always be a tad slower than the target machines, but this cuts into your development time. A better solution is to have slower machines in the test environment and a few slower machines in the development lab.

like image 30
rsp Avatar answered Oct 08 '22 23:10

rsp