Given the following code:
package com.gmail.oksandum.test; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { } public void foo() { class LocalFoo { LocalFoo(String in) { //Some logic } } List<String> ls = new ArrayList<>(); ls.stream().map(LocalFoo::new); //Line 21 } }
my IDE gives me no errors. That is, until I try to build the project and run it. When I do that it gives me a compiler error that looks like this:
Error:(21, 24) java: incompatible types: cannot infer type-variable(s) R (argument mismatch; invalid constructor reference cannot access constructor LocalFoo(java.lang.String) an enclosing instance of type com.gmail.oksandum.test.Test is not in scope)
Now, I figured, given the error message, that this wouldn't happen if foo() were static. And quite right, this only happens if foo() is an instance method. And it only happens if LocalFoo is a local class in the instance method, and only if a constructor reference is used (i.e never a regular method reference).
What's more, if I change line 21 into
ls.stream().map(str -> new LocalFoo(str));
the compiler suddenly gives no error.
So to recap. If I try to use a constructor reference on a local class declared within an instance method, the compiler complains about not being able to access the constructor, about which I am confused.
If someone could shed some light on why this happens it would be appreciated. Thanks.
Explanation: The constructor cannot have a return type.
A method reference can also be applicable to constructors in Java 8. A constructor reference can be created using the class name and a new keyword. The constructor reference can be assigned to any functional interface reference that defines a method compatible with the constructor.
Local classes are non-static because they have access to instance members of the enclosing block. Consequently, they cannot contain most kinds of static declarations.
A local class is declared locally within a block of Java code, rather than as a member of a class. Typically, a local class is defined within a method, but it can also be defined within a static initializer or instance initializer of a class.
It looks like LocalFoo
is treated somehow like a non-static class. That's why it claims no instance of Test is in scope.
From the tutorial:
Local classes are non-static because they have access to instance members of the enclosing block. Consequently, they cannot contain most kinds of static declarations.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/localclasses.html
The method foo()
or the class LocalFoo
must be static for this to work. But a class inside a method can't be declared as static. So you'd have to move it out of the method if foo()
should remain nonstatic (as an inner, static class). Another option is to just use this:ls.stream().map(s -> new LocalFoo(s));
There should be a way to just say Test.this.LocalFoo
, but that doesn't work. And if it did the compiler should also just accept LocalFoo::new
.
There is a bug report now: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144673
(See comment by Brian Goetz)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With