In a project I am interfacing between C++ and a C library that uses stdbool.h defined as such.
#ifndef _STDBOOL_H
#define _STDBOOL_H
/* C99 Boolean types for compilers without C99 support */
/* http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/stdbool.h.html */
#if !defined(__cplusplus)
#if !defined(__GNUC__)
/* _Bool builtin type is included in GCC */
typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
#endif
#define bool _Bool
#define true 1
#define false 0
#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1
#endif
#endif
Some structures have bool
members. So if I have one of these structures defined as local variables within a C++ function and pass it to a C function the sizes are inconsistent between C++ and C as bool is one bye in C++ and 4 in C.
Does anyone have any advice to how to overcome this without resorting to my current solution which is
//#define bool _Bool
#define bool unsigned char
Which is against the C99 standard for stdbool.h
I found the answer to my own question by finding a more compatible implementation of stdbool.h
that is compliant with the C99 standard.
#ifndef _STDBOOL_H
#define _STDBOOL_H
#include <stdint.h>
/* C99 Boolean types for compilers without C99 support */
/* http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/stdbool.h.html */
#if !defined(__cplusplus)
#if !defined(__GNUC__)
/* _Bool builtin type is included in GCC */
/* ISO C Standard: 5.2.5 An object declared as
type _Bool is large enough to store
the values 0 and 1. */
/* We choose 8 bit to match C++ */
/* It must also promote to integer */
typedef int8_t _Bool;
#endif
/* ISO C Standard: 7.16 Boolean type */
#define bool _Bool
#define true 1
#define false 0
#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1
#endif
#endif
This is taken from the Ada Class Library project.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With