The following code sample:
interface I<out T>
where T : class, I<T>
{
T GetT();
}
interface J : I<J>
{
}
abstract class B<T> : I<T>
where T : B<T>
{
T I<T>.GetT()
{
return null;
}
}
class C : B<C>, J
{
}
fails to compile (under VS2010 with SP1) with the following error:
Error 4 'C' does not implement interface member 'I<J>.GetT()'
However, C does implement (through its base B<C>) I<C>, which, due to I being declared covariant, should capture I<J> as well (as C : J).
Is this a compiler bug? If not, why am I not allowed to do that?
Even though it is covariant, you cannot change the return type of the interface. This is no different from the covariance in non-Generic classes.
interface Animal
{
Animal GetAnimal();
}
class Cat : Animal
{
//Not ALlowed
Cat GetAnimal()
{
return this;
}
//Allowed
Animal GetAnimal()
{
return this;
}
}
The problem is that C as a specialization of B<C>
returns C I<C>.GetT()
, however the specification of J requires J GetT()
.
Try the following:
interface I<out T>
where T : class, I<T>
{
T GetT();
}
interface J : I<J>
{
}
abstract class B<T,U> : I<U>
where T : B<T,U>, U
where U : class, I<U>
{
U I<U>.GetT()
{
return null;
}
}
class C : B<C,J>, J
{
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With