I have a pretty standard RecyclerView
with a vertical LinearLayoutManager
. I keep inserting new items at the top and I'm calling notifyItemInserted(0)
.
I want the list to stay scrolled to the top; to always display the 0th position.
From my requirement's point of view, the LayoutManager
behaves differently based on the number of items.
While all items fit on the screen, it looks and behaves as I expect: The new item always appears on top and shifts everything below it.
However, as soon as the no. of items exceeds the RecyclerView's bounds, new items are added above the currently visible one, but the visible items stay in view. The user has to scroll to see the newest item.
This behavior is totally understandable and fine for many applications, but not for a "live feed", where seeing the most recent thing is more important than "not distracting" the user with auto-scrolls.
I know this question is almost a duplicate of Adding new item to the top of the RecyclerView... but all of the proposed answers are mere workarounds (most of them quite good, admittedly).
I'm looking for a way to actually change this behavior. I want the LayoutManager to act exactly the same, no matter the number of items. I want it to always shift all of the items (just like it does for the first few additions), not to stop shifting items at some point, and compensate by smooth-scrolling the list to the top.
Basically, no smoothScrollToPosition
, no RecyclerView.SmoothScroller
. Subclassing LinearLayoutManager
is fine. I'm already digging through its code, but without any luck so far, so I decided to ask in case someone already dealt with this. Thanks for any ideas!
EDIT: To clarify why I'm dismissing answers from the linked question: Mostly I'm concerned about animation smoothness.
Notice in the first GIF where ItemAnimator
is moving other items while adding the new one, both fade-in and move animations have the same duration. But when I'm "moving" the items by smooth scrolling, I cannot easily control the speed of the scroll. Even with default ItemAnimator
durations, this doesn't look as good, but in my particular case, I even needed to slow down the ItemAnimator
durations, which makes it even worse:
Just set your LayoutManager and adapter for the first time. Make a setDataList method in your adapter class. And set your updated list to adapter list. And then every time of calling API set that list to setDataList and call adapter.
It's pretty simple, simply set the RecyclerView 's height to wrap_content . That's right.
To help you build apps with lists, Android provides the RecyclerView . RecyclerView is designed to be very efficient, even with large lists, by reusing, or recycling, the views that have scrolled off the screen.
Although I wrote this answer and this is the accepted solution, I suggest a look at the other later answers to see if they work for you before attempting this.
When an item is added to the top of the RecyclerView
and the item can fit onto the screen, the item is attached to a view holder and RecyclerView
undergoes an animation phase to move items down to display the new item at the top.
If the new item cannot be displayed without scrolling, a view holder is not created so there is nothing to animate. The only way to get the new item onto the screen when this happens is to scroll which causes the view holder to be created so the view can be laid out on the screen. (There does seem to be an edge case where the view is partially displayed and a view holder is created, but I will ignore this particular instance since it is not germane.)
So, the issue is that two different actions, animation of an added view and scrolling of an added view, must be made to look the same to the user. We could dive into the underlying code and figure out exactly what is going on in terms of view holder creation, animation timing, etc. But, even if we can duplicate the actions, it can break if the underlying code changes. This is what you are resisting.
An alternative is to add a header at position zero of the RecyclerView
. You will always see the animation when this header is displayed and new items are added to position 1. If you don't want a header, you can make it zero height and it will not display. The following video shows this technique:
This is the code for the demo. It simply adds a dummy entry at position 0 of the items. If a dummy entry is not to your liking, there are other ways to approach this. You can search for ways to add headers to RecyclerView
.
(If you do use a scrollbar, it will misbehave as you can probably tell from the demo. To fix this 100%, you will have to take over a lot of the scrollbar height and placement computation. The custom computeVerticalScrollOffset()
for the LinearLayoutManager
takes care of placing the scrollbar at the top when appropriate. (Code was introduced after video taken.) The scrollbar, however, jumps when scrolling down. A better placement computation would take care of this problem. See this Stack Overflow question for more information on scrollbars in the context of varying height items.)
MainActivity.java
public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity implements View.OnClickListener { private TheAdapter mAdapter; private final ArrayList<String> mItems = new ArrayList<>(); private int mItemCount = 0; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.activity_main); RecyclerView recyclerView = (RecyclerView) findViewById(R.id.recyclerView); LinearLayoutManager layoutManager = new LinearLayoutManager(this, LinearLayoutManager.VERTICAL, false) { @Override public int computeVerticalScrollOffset(RecyclerView.State state) { if (findFirstCompletelyVisibleItemPosition() == 0) { // Force scrollbar to top of range. When scrolling down, the scrollbar // will jump since RecyclerView seems to assume the same height for // all items. return 0; } else { return super.computeVerticalScrollOffset(state); } } }; recyclerView.setLayoutManager(layoutManager); for (mItemCount = 0; mItemCount < 6; mItemCount++) { mItems.add(0, "Item # " + mItemCount); } // Create a dummy entry that is just a placeholder. mItems.add(0, "Dummy item that won't display"); mAdapter = new TheAdapter(mItems); recyclerView.setAdapter(mAdapter); } @Override public void onClick(View view) { // Always at to position #1 to let animation occur. mItems.add(1, "Item # " + mItemCount++); mAdapter.notifyItemInserted(1); } }
TheAdapter.java
class TheAdapter extends RecyclerView.Adapter<TheAdapter.ItemHolder> { private ArrayList<String> mData; public TheAdapter(ArrayList<String> data) { mData = data; } @Override public ItemHolder onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType) { View view; if (viewType == 0) { // Create a zero-height view that will sit at the top of the RecyclerView to force // animations when items are added below it. view = new Space(parent.getContext()); view.setLayoutParams(new ViewGroup.LayoutParams(ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, 0)); } else { view = LayoutInflater.from(parent.getContext()) .inflate(R.layout.list_item, parent, false); } return new ItemHolder(view); } @Override public void onBindViewHolder(final ItemHolder holder, int position) { if (position == 0) { return; } holder.mTextView.setText(mData.get(position)); } @Override public int getItemViewType(int position) { return (position == 0) ? 0 : 1; } @Override public int getItemCount() { return mData.size(); } public static class ItemHolder extends RecyclerView.ViewHolder { private TextView mTextView; public ItemHolder(View itemView) { super(itemView); mTextView = (TextView) itemView.findViewById(R.id.textView); } } }
activity_main.xml
<android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="match_parent" android:orientation="vertical" tools:context=".MainActivity"> <android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView android:id="@+id/recyclerView" android:layout_width="0dp" android:layout_height="0dp" android:scrollbars="vertical" app:layout_constraintBottom_toTopOf="@+id/button" app:layout_constraintStart_toStartOf="parent" app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="parent" app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent" /> <Button android:id="@+id/button" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_marginBottom="8dp" android:layout_marginEnd="8dp" android:layout_marginStart="8dp" android:text="Button" android:onClick="onClick" app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="parent" app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="parent" app:layout_constraintStart_toStartOf="parent" /> </android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout>
list_item.xml
<LinearLayout android:id="@+id/list_item" android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_marginTop="16dp" android:orientation="horizontal"> <View android:id="@+id/box" android:layout_width="50dp" android:layout_height="50dp" android:layout_marginStart="16dp" android:background="@android:color/holo_green_light" app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="parent" app:layout_constraintStart_toStartOf="parent" app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent" /> <TextView android:id="@+id/textView" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_marginStart="16dp" android:textSize="24sp" app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="parent" app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@id/box" app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent" tools:text="TextView" /> </LinearLayout>
I'm also displaying a live feed of items, and when a new item is added, it's before the first item. But in the recycler view, I need to scroll up to see the new item.
To solve the problem, add to the Adapter a RecyclerView.AdapterDataObserver()
and override the onItemRangeInserted()
. When new data is added, check if the data is on at position 0, and the recycler view was on top (You don't want to autoscroll to first position if you were scrolling in the list).
Exemple :
adapter.registerAdapterDataObserver(new RecyclerView.AdapterDataObserver() { @Override public void onItemRangeInserted(int positionStart, int itemCount) { super.onItemRangeInserted(positionStart, itemCount); if (positionStart == 0 && positionStart == layoutManager.findFirstCompletelyVisibleItemPosition()) { layoutManager.scrollToPosition(0); } } });
This solution worked fine for me, with different type of Adapter, like ListAdapter
and PagedListAdapter
. I firstly wanted to use a similar implementation of the accepted solution, where you add a dumb first item, but in PagedListAdapter
it's impossible as list are immutable.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With