In my program, I have a bunch of objects of a custom class Position. The declaration of Position is as follows:
class Position {
public:
Position(int x, int y);
~Position();
Actor *getActor() { return actor.get(); };
void setActor(Actor *actor) { actor = std::move(actor); };
Actor *clearActor() { return actor.release(); };
int getX() { return x; };
int getY() { return y; };
private:
int x, y;
std::unique_ptr<Actor> actor;
};
I also have a class called Actor. Not every Position will have an Actor, and so the majority of the time the unique_ptr "actor" of a Position object should be empty (I'm using unique_ptrs to automatically clean up any Actor associated with a Position at runtime).
The Position constructor is as follows:
Position::Position(int x, int y)
{
this->x = x;
this->y = y;
actor.reset(nullptr);
}
However, I know that this isn't correctly setting the stored pointer to nullptr because when I try calling actor.get() inside Position::getActor(), I get an error as follows:
First-chance exception at 0x01096486 in ____.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x00000008.
Is there a way to initialize a member unique_ptr to nullptr? I know I could get around this by adding a variable to the Actor class that defines whether or not the Actor is active, setting the unique_ptr to a new inactive Actor, and ignoring all inactive Actors, but I'd rather avoid this if possible.
Thanks!
Edit: I've added the code where I call getActor:
bool Grid::addActor(Actor *actor, int x, int y)
{
Position *destination = at(x, y);
if (!destination->getActor()) {
destination->setActor(actor);
actor->setPosition(x, y);
actor->setGrid(this);
return true;
}
else {
inactive_actors.emplace_back(actor);
return false;
}
}
Nullability - a scoped_ptr or unique_ptr can be null, a value object can never be. Polymorphism - a value object is always exactly its static type, but you can substitute in different derived types for a unique_ptr. The previously-held object is automatically destroyed when you do this.
Yes, you can compare it to nullptr after the move and it is guaranteed to compare equal.
std::unique_ptr is a smart pointer that owns and manages another object through a pointer and disposes of that object when the unique_ptr goes out of scope. The object is disposed of, using the associated deleter when either of the following happens: the managing unique_ptr object is destroyed.
Your error is here:
void setActor(Actor *actor) { actor = std::move(actor); };
You're assigning the result of std::move
to the parameter actor
. You probably meant to reset
the member variable actor
with the parameter actor
:
void setActor(Actor *actor) { this->actor.reset(actor); };
As a side note, you can simply change your constructor to this:
Position::Position(int x, int y)
: x(x), y(y)
{
}
This will initialize the members x
and y
with the arguments, and default-initialize std::unique_ptr<Actor> actor
to null.
You don't need to initialize the std::unique pointer to null. Just leave it as its default empty value in the constructor and only ever reset it to point to a non-null pointer.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With