Menu
Specifically, when you create an interface/implementor pair, and there is no overriding organizational concern (such as the interface should go in a different assembly ie, as recommended by the s# architecture) do you have a default way of organizing them in your namespace/naming scheme?
This is obviously a more opinion based question but I think some people have thought about this more and we can all benefit from their conclusions.
698
A namespace can include interfaces, classes, functions and variables to support a single or a group of related functionalities. A namespace can be created using the namespace keyword followed by the namespace name. All the interfaces, classes etc.
Because interfaces can be implemented by multiple components, it's good practice to put them in a separate assembly from that of the implementing components.
At its heart, Visual Studio Code is a code editor. Like many other code editors, VS Code adopts a common user interface and layout of an explorer on the left, showing all of the files and folders you have access to, and an editor on the right, showing the content of the files you have opened.
VB.NET Interfaces So, an interface is nothing but a collection of method and property declarations. An interface can declare only a group of related functionalities, it is the responsibility of the deriving class to implement that functionality. An interface is defined with the Interface keyword.
The answer depends on your intentions.
I'm sure there are other options as well, but as with most namespace issues, it comes down to the use-cases of the project, and the classes and interfaces it contains.
124
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
