I tend to use it whenever I am working on a prototype script, and:
fileCount
), andIn this situation, in order to avoid potential variable clash, I delete the bugger as soon as I am done with it. I know, in a production code I should avoid 1., 2., and 3., but going from a prototype that works to a completely polished class is time consuming. Sometimes I might want to settle for a sub-optimal, quick refactoring job. In that case I find keeping the del
statements handy. Am I developing an unnecessary, bad habit? Is del
totally avoidable? When would it be a good thing?
The del keyword is used to delete objects. In Python everything is an object, so the del keyword can also be used to delete variables, lists, or parts of a list etc.
The del statement can be used to delete an item at a given index. It can also be used to remove slices from a list.
Python's del statement is used to delete variables and objects in the Python program. Iterable objects such as user-defined objects, lists, set, tuple, dictionary, variables defined by the user, etc. can be deleted from existence and from the memory locations in Python using the del statement.
The del keyword in python is primarily used to delete objects in Python. Since everything in python represents an object in one way or another, The del keyword can also be used to delete a list, slice a list, delete a dictionaries, remove key-value pairs from a dictionary, delete variables, etc.
I don't think that del
by itself is a code smell.
Reusing a variable name in the same namespace is definitely a code smell as is not using classes and other namespaces where appropriate. So using del
to facilitate that sort of thing is a code smell.
The only really appropriate use of del
that I can think of off the top of my head is breaking cyclic references which are often a code smell as well (and often times, this isn't even necessary). Remember, all del
does is delete the reference to the object and not the object itself. That will be taken care of by either reference counting or garbage collecting.
>>> a = [1, 2] >>> b = a >>> del a >>> a Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> NameError: name 'a' is not defined >>> b [1, 2]
You can see that the list is kept alive after the del
statement because b
still holds a reference to it.
So, while del
isn't really a code smell, it can be associated with things that are.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With