I've seen references to curried functions in several articles and blogs but I can't find a good explanation (or at least one that makes sense!)
Currying is the transformation of a function with multiple arguments into a sequence of single-argument functions. That means converting a function like this f(a, b, c, ...) into a function like this f(a)(b)(c)... . If you know Python's functools. partial , then this is very similar to it.
Currying is when you break down a function that takes multiple arguments into a series of functions that each take only one argument. Here's an example in JavaScript: function add (a, b) { return a + b; } add(3, 4); // returns 7. This is a function that takes two arguments, a and b, and returns their sum.
Simple answer. Currying: Lets you call a function, splitting it in multiple calls, providing one argument per-call. Partial Application: Lets you call a function, splitting it in multiple calls, providing multiple arguments per-call.
Currying means that the closure does not have to receive all of its arguments at once, but separately. I've found this useful metaphor around the internet: Think of currying as adding ingredients (arguments, or other spices) to a function one by one. You can drop some arguments now, and other arguments as you go.
Currying is when you break down a function that takes multiple arguments into a series of functions that each take only one argument. Here's an example in JavaScript:
function add (a, b) { return a + b; } add(3, 4); // returns 7
This is a function that takes two arguments, a and b, and returns their sum. We will now curry this function:
function add (a) { return function (b) { return a + b; } }
This is a function that takes one argument, a
, and returns a function that takes another argument, b
, and that function returns their sum.
add(3)(4); var add3 = add(3); add3(4);
The first statement returns 7, like the add(3, 4)
statement. The second statement defines a new function called add3
that will add 3 to its argument. (This is what some may call a closure.) The third statement uses the add3
operation to add 3 to 4, again producing 7 as a result.
In an algebra of functions, dealing with functions that take multiple arguments (or equivalent one argument that's an N-tuple) is somewhat inelegant -- but, as Moses Schönfinkel (and, independently, Haskell Curry) proved, it's not needed: all you need are functions that take one argument.
So how do you deal with something you'd naturally express as, say, f(x,y)
? Well, you take that as equivalent to f(x)(y)
-- f(x)
, call it g
, is a function, and you apply that function to y
. In other words, you only have functions that take one argument -- but some of those functions return other functions (which ALSO take one argument;-).
As usual, wikipedia has a nice summary entry about this, with many useful pointers (probably including ones regarding your favorite languages;-) as well as slightly more rigorous mathematical treatment.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With