Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

implicit conversion over multiple levels, why does int to double automatically work?

Tags:

scala

I was always figuring implicit conversions over multiple levels is not possible in scala (unless you define view bounds: http://docs.scala-lang.org/tutorials/FAQ/context-and-view-bounds.html)

But it seems that there is a flaw in the type system or an inconsistency. Following an example (adapted from How can I chain implicits in Scala?)

class A(val n: Double){
  def total = n + 10
}

object T1{
  implicit def toA(n: Double): A = new A(n)
  val i : Int = 5
  println(i.total) //Why does this work?
  println(5.2.total)
}

I do not really understand why the implicit conversion from Int -> Double -> A works. Can someone please explain the reasons? Thanks

like image 783
Robert Stoll Avatar asked Jan 31 '15 13:01

Robert Stoll


People also ask

What happens in implicit conversion?

An implicit conversion sequence is the sequence of conversions required to convert an argument in a function call to the type of the corresponding parameter in a function declaration. The compiler tries to determine an implicit conversion sequence for each argument.

When can an implicit conversion occur between classes?

Implicit Type Conversion is also known as 'automatic type conversion'. It is done by the compiler on its own, without any external trigger from the user. It generally takes place when in an expression more than one data type is present.

What is implicit numeric widening?

Numeric widening is an implicit conversion between two numbers of different types (Int and Double, for instance) useful for many cases, but it may be an huge source of bugs.

What is an implicit conversion function in Scala?

Implicit conversions in Scala are the set of methods that are apply when an object of wrong type is used. It allows the compiler to automatically convert of one type to another. Implicit conversions are applied in two conditions: First, if an expression of type A and S does not match to the expected expression type B.


2 Answers

It happens via a different mechanism, unique to the numeric types, called numeric widening.

SLS 6.26.1 Value Conversions says:

The following five implicit conversions can be applied to an expression e which has some value type T and which is type-checked with some expected type pt.

Static Overloading Resolution

Type Instantiation

Numeric Widening

Numeric Literal Narrowing

Value Discarding

View Application

Dynamic Member Selection

(Okay, that's more than five....not sure why :)

The one of interest is numeric widening:

If e has a primitive number type which weakly conforms to the expected type, it is widened to the expected type using one of the numeric conversion methods toShort, toChar, toInt, toLong, toFloat, toDouble defined here.

3.5.16 Weak Conformance says

In some situations Scala uses a more general conformance relation. A type S weakly conforms to a type T, written S<:wT, if S<:T or both S and T are primitive number types and S precedes T in the following ordering.

Byte  <:w Short
Short <:w Int
Char  <:w Int
Int   <:w Long
Long  <:w Float
Float <:w Double

So println(i.total) becomes println(i.total.toFloat) because Int <:w <: Long <: Float.

Java (and C# and many other languages) have numeric widening, and Scala decided to keep it.

Note that the reverse does not work: a Float cannot be implicitly converted to Int via this way, since magnitude could be lost; it's not a "widening".

You can add -Ywarn-numeric-widen and get a warning when this happens.

like image 79
Paul Draper Avatar answered Sep 27 '22 19:09

Paul Draper


As Gabor already commented, this is due to numeric widening. If you run with the -print option, you will see that a .toDouble is appended to the i, which then allows it to use the toA implicit. You can run scalac with the warn-numeric-widen and this will at least give you the following:

<console>:14: warning: implicit numeric widening
     println(i.total) //Why does this work?
             ^
like image 38
Justin Pihony Avatar answered Sep 27 '22 20:09

Justin Pihony