If async/await doesn't create new thread then explain this code

Question

I've read this thread which claims with reference to msdn with idea that async/await doesn't create new threads. Please look at following code:

static class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var task = SlowThreadAsync();
        for(int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(i * i);
        }
        Console.WriteLine("Slow thread result {0}", task.Result);
        Console.WriteLine("Main finished on thread {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
        Console.ReadKey();
    }

    static async Task<int> SlowThreadAsync()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("SlowThreadAsync started on thread {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
        await Task.Delay(2000);
        Console.WriteLine("SlowThreadAsync completed on thread {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
        return 3443;

    }
}

As result of this code I got different ThreadId. Why the same thread gets different ThreadId?

Answer 1

You're using a console application for your example. This effects greatly the outcome of your test. A console application has no custom SynchronizationContext (like Winforms, WPF and ASP.NET have), hence it uses the ThreadPoolTaskScheduler to schedule continuations on an arbitrary thread-pool thread. Try this same example in a UI application and you'll see the continuation invoked on the same thread.

Answer 2

What the articles you linked are trying to get across is that calling async methods does not guarantee that any of the code runs on a separate thread. So if you do want to guarantee this, you have to do it manually. In particular they're not trying to say that an async method will always run on the same thread as the calling method, because this is blatantly false in many scenarios.