Let's focus on this example:
template<typename T> class C{ public: void func(std::vector<T>& vec, std::function<T( const std::string)>& f){ //Do Something } };
And now, I am trying:
std::vector<int> vec; auto lambda = [](const std::string& s) { return std::stoi(s); }; C<int> c; c.func(vec, lambda);
It causes errors:
no matching function for call to ‘C<int>::func(std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >&, main()::<lambda(const string&)>&)’ ref.parse(vec, lambda);
Please explain me what is not ok and how to implement it with std::bind as well.
Permalink. All the alternatives to passing a lambda by value actually capture a lambda's address, be it by const l-value reference, by non-const l-value reference, by universal reference, or by pointer.
Instances of std::function can store, copy, and invoke any CopyConstructible Callable target -- functions, lambda expressions, bind expressions, or other function objects, as well as pointers to member functions and pointers to data members.
Lambda's type One important thing to note is that a lambda is not a std::function .
It's because a lambda function is not a std::function<...>
. The type of
auto lambda = [](const std::string& s) { return std::stoi(s); };
is not std::function<int(const std::string&)>
, but something unspecified which can be assigned to a std::function
. Now, when you call your method, the compiler complains that the types don't match, as conversion would mean to create a temporary which cannot bind to a non-const reference.
This is also not specific to lambda functions as the error happens when you pass a normal function. This won't work either:
int f(std::string const&) {return 0;} int main() { std::vector<int> vec; C<int> c; c.func(vec, f); }
You can either assign the lambda to a std::function
std::function<int(const std::string&)> lambda = [](const std::string& s) { return std::stoi(s); };
,change your member-function to take the function by value or const-reference or make the function parameter a template type. This will be slightly more efficient in case you pass a lambda or normal function pointer, but I personally like the expressive std::function
type in the signature.
template<typename T> class C{ public: void func(std::vector<T>& vec, std::function<T( const std::string)> f){ //Do Something } // or void func(std::vector<T>& vec, std::function<T( const std::string)> const& f){ //Do Something } // or template<typename F> func(std::vector<T>& vec, F f){ //Do Something } };
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With