Here is my situation. I have featureBranchA
in github pending a pull request which won't get merged until tomorrow or later. I started working on featureBranchB
but I ran in to a snag. I need the changes made in featureBranchA
in order to make featureBranchB
work. I hate not being able to work due to waiting on someone else.
What I've done in the past is switch to featureBranchA
and branch off that naming the branch featureBranchA/featureBranchB
. When featureBranchA
is merged I then submit a pull request to the newly renamed featureBranchB
. This is not the best approach as I have to keep a list of branches that need pull requests and watch for when the "parent" branch was merged.
Another method I've used is branching featureBranchB
off master
and merging changes from featureBranchA
in to it. This always messes up when I'm submitting a pull request though. The pull request for featureBranchB
will have its commits AND featureBranchA
commits even though featureBranchA
has already been merged. I've also tried using rebase instead of merge but it messes up when it comes time to submit the pull request.
Any advice on this kind of work flow?
Branching featureB off featureA is the best approach. Rather than monitoring when featureA is approved, submit the pull request when you're ready and note in the request that it depends on featureA. Reference the issue number in the pull request and Github will place notes itself. Something like "this depends on #123 being accepted".
If featureA is changed before being accepted, you (or the person accepting the pull request) should merge or rebase with featureA prior to merging featureB.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With