I'm writing testing code that will automatically iterate thru all Q_PROPERTY's of widgets and some properties are using types that are registered via qRegisterMetaType. If i want to read/write these into QVariant i need to use QVariant::UserType when storing them into variant. So far so good.
But when i want to test reads and writes of these properties, i need to also know their type. For stuff that are already standard qt types, i can do this via QVariant::type() but as i have alot of usertypes, how would this be accomplished ?
From the api of QVariant, i spotted this:
bool QVariant::canConvert ( Type t ) const
But i'm slightly doubtful if this will lead to wrong types in case of enums?
So, what would be the foolproof way to verify what type of usertype is stored in QVariant ?
To find out what data type the QVariant holds use the type() method and to convert the object to a different type use convert(). To verify if a given object can be converted to a different type, use canConvert().
Because C++ forbids unions from including types that have non-default constructors or destructors, most interesting Qt classes cannot be used in unions. Without QVariant, this would be a problem for QObject::property() and for database work, etc. A QVariant object holds a single value of a single typeId() at a time.
For user defined types there is QVariant::userType(). It works like QVariant::type() but returns the type id integer of the user defined type whereas QVariant::type() always return QVariant::UserType.
There is also QVariant::typeName() which returns the name of the type as a string.
EDIT :
It probably depends on how you set the QVariant. Directly using QVariant::QVariant(int type, const void * copy) is discouraged.
Say I have three types like this :
class MyFirstType
{
public:
MyFirstType();
MyFirstType(const MyFirstType &other);
~MyFirstType();
MyFirstType(const QString &content);
QString content() const;
private:
QString m_content;
};
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(MyFirstType);
The third without Q_DECLARE_METATYPE
I store them in QVariant :
QString content = "Test";
MyFirstType first(content);
MySecondType second(content);
MyThirdType third(content);
QVariant firstVariant;
firstVariant.setValue(first);
QVariant secondVariant = QVariant::fromValue(second);
int myType = qRegisterMetaType<MyThirdType>("MyThirdType");
QVariant thirdVariant(myType, &third); // Here the type isn't checked against the data passed
qDebug() << "typeName for first :" << firstVariant.typeName();
qDebug() << "UserType :" << firstVariant.userType();
qDebug() << "Type : " << firstVariant.type();
[...]
I get :
typeName for first : MyFirstType
UserType : 256
Type : QVariant::UserType
typeName for second : MySecondType
UserType : 257
Type : QVariant::UserType
typeName for third : MyThirdType
UserType : 258
Type : QVariant::UserType
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With