This is a followup to question 912526 - How do I pass lots of variables to and from a function in Python?.
There are lots of variables that need to get passed around in the program I'm writing, and from my previous question I understand that I should put these variables into classes, and then pass around the classes.
Some of these variables come in repetetive sets - for a thin film calculation I need to track the optical properties (index of refraction, absorption, thickness, etc) for a number of layers.
Is the best way to store variables like this to create a class derived from a Python list to store the set of classes which each hold the variables for a single layer? And then put the functions that deal with the set of layers in class derived from the list, and the functions that deal with a specific layer in that class? Is there a better way to do this with a single class?
Using the two class approach in the following example, I'm able to set things up so that I can access variables using statments like
n1 = layers[5].n
This is the best way to do this, right?
#Test passing values to and from functions
class Layers(list):
def add(self,n,k,comment):
self.append( OneLayer(n,k,comment) )
def input_string(self):
input_string = []
for layer in self:
vars = layer.input_string()
for var in vars:
input_string.append( var )
return input_string
def set_layers(self,results):
for layer,i in enumerate(self):
j = i*layer.num_var
layer.set_layer( *results[j:j+2] )
class OneLayer(object):
def __init__(self,n,k,comment):
self.n = n
self.k = k
self.comment = comment
def input_string(self):
return [['f','Index of Refraction',self.n], ['f','Absorption',self.k],['s','Comment',self.comment]]
def set_layer(self,n,k,comment):
self.n = n; self.k=k; self.comment = comment
def num_var(self):
return 3
if __name__ == '__main__':
layers = Layers()
layers.add(1.0,0.0,'This vacuum sucks')
layers.add(1.5,0.0,'BK 7 Glass')
print layers[0].n
print layers.input_string()
layers[1].set_layer(1.77,0.0,'Sapphire')
print layers.input_string()
I get the following output from this test program:
1.0
[['f', 'Index of Refraction', 1.0], ['f', 'Absorption', 0.0], ['s', 'Comment', 'This vacuum sucks'], ['f', 'Index of Refraction', 1.5], ['f', 'Absorption', 0.0], ['s', 'Comment', 'BK 7 Glass']]
[['f', 'Index of Refraction', 1.0], ['f', 'Absorption', 0.0], ['s', 'Comment', 'This vacuum sucks'], ['f', 'Index of Refraction', 1.77], ['f', 'Absorption', 0.0], ['s', 'Comment', 'Sapphire']]
There are several issues in your code:
1.If you make any list operation the result will be a native list:
layers1 = Layers()
layers2 = Layers()
layers1 + layers2 -> the result will be a native list
2.Why define input_string when you can override __repr__
or __str__
3.Why do you even have to derive from list in this case? You only need to derive from list if you want your class to behave exactly like a list. But in your case you seem to be looking for a container. All you need to do to get your class to behave similar to a list is to override some special python methods http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html#emulating-container-types
class Layers(object):
def __init__(self, container=None):
if container is None:
container = []
self.container = container
def add(self,n,k,comment):
self.container.append([n,k,comment])
def __str__(self):
return str(self.container)
def __repr__(self):
return str(self.container)
def __getitem__(self, key):
return Layers(self.container[key])
def __len__(self):
return len(self.container)
>>> l = Layers()
>>> l.add(1, 2, 'test')
>>> l.add(1, 2, 'test')
>>> l
[[1, 2, 'test'], [1, 2, 'test']]
>>> l[0]
[1, 2, 'test']
>>> len(l)
2
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With