Doc's are lacking an example...How do you use bisect.insort_left)_
based on a key?
Trying to insert based on key.
bisect.insort_left(data, ('brown', 7))
puts insert at data[0]
.
From docs...
bisect.insort_left(
a, x, lo=0, hi=len(a))
Insert x in a in sorted order. This is equivalent toa.insert(bisect.bisect_left(a, x, lo, hi), x)
assuming that a is already sorted. Keep in mind that the O(log n) search is dominated by the slow O(n) insertion step.
Sample usage:
>>> data = [('red', 5), ('blue', 1), ('yellow', 8), ('black', 0)] >>> data.sort(key=lambda r: r[1]) >>> keys = [r[1] for r in data] # precomputed list of keys >>> data[bisect_left(keys, 0)] ('black', 0) >>> data[bisect_left(keys, 1)] ('blue', 1) >>> data[bisect_left(keys, 5)] ('red', 5) >>> data[bisect_left(keys, 8)] ('yellow', 8) >>>
I want to put ('brown', 7)
after ('red', 5)
on sorted list in data
using bisect.insort_left
. Right now bisect.insort_left(data, ('brown', 7))
puts ('brown', 7)
at data[0]
...because I am not using the keys to do insert...docs don't show to do inserts using the keys.
bisect. bisect_left returns the leftmost place in the sorted list to insert the given element. bisect. bisect_right returns the rightmost place in the sorted list to insert the given element.
The bisect module in Python assists in preserving a list in a sorted order, as it bypasses the sort operation after each insertion. Insort is one of the functions of the bisect module.
The insort() method inserts a new element into an already sorted Python list. If the list already has existing elements as the new element then the new element is inserted into the right of the last such existing element. The functions insort() and insort_right() behave the same way.
You could wrap your iterable in a class that implements __getitem__
and __len__
. This allows you the opportunity to use a key with bisect_left
. If you set up your class to take the iterable and a key function as arguments.
To extend this to be usable with insort_left
it's required to implement the insert
method. The problem here is that if you do that is that insort_left
will try to insert your key argument into the list containing the objects of which the the key is a member.
An example is clearer
from bisect import bisect_left, insort_left class KeyWrapper: def __init__(self, iterable, key): self.it = iterable self.key = key def __getitem__(self, i): return self.key(self.it[i]) def __len__(self): return len(self.it) def insert(self, index, item): print('asked to insert %s at index%d' % (item, index)) self.it.insert(index, {"time":item}) timetable = [{"time": "0150"}, {"time": "0250"}, {"time": "0350"}, {"time": "0450"}, {"time": "0550"}, {"time": "0650"}, {"time": "0750"}] bslindex = bisect_left(KeyWrapper(timetable, key=lambda t: t["time"]), "0359") islindex = insort_left(KeyWrapper(timetable, key=lambda t: t["time"]), "0359")
See how in my insert
method I had to make it specific to the timetable dictionary otherwise insort_left
would try insert "0359"
where it should insert {"time": "0359"}
?
Ways round this could be to construct a dummy object for the comparison, inherit from KeyWrapper
and override insert
or pass some sort of factory function to create the object. None of these ways are particularly desirable from an idiomatic python point of view.
So the easiest way is to just use the KeyWrapper
with bisect_left
, which returns you the insert index and then do the insert yourself. You could easily wrap this in a dedicated function.
e.g.
bslindex = bisect_left(KeyWrapper(timetable, key=lambda t: t["time"]), "0359") timetable.insert(bslindex, {"time":"0359"})
In this case ensure you don't implement insert
, so you will be immediately aware if you accidentally pass a KeyWrapper
to a mutating function like insort_left
which probably wouldn't do the right thing.
To use your example data
from bisect import bisect_left class KeyWrapper: def __init__(self, iterable, key): self.it = iterable self.key = key def __getitem__(self, i): return self.key(self.it[i]) def __len__(self): return len(self.it) data = [('red', 5), ('blue', 1), ('yellow', 8), ('black', 0)] data.sort(key=lambda c: c[1]) newcol = ('brown', 7) bslindex = bisect_left(KeyWrapper(data, key=lambda c: c[1]), newcol[1]) data.insert(bslindex, newcol) print(data)
This does essentially the same thing the SortedCollection
recipe does that the bisect
documentation mentions in its See also: section at the end, but unlike the insert()
method in the recipe, the function shown supports a key-function.
What's being done is a separate sorted keys
list is maintained in parallel with the sorted data
list to improve performance (it's faster than creating the keys list before each insertion, but keeping it around and updating it isn't strictly required). The ActiveState recipe encapsulated this for you within a class, but in the code below they're just two separate independent lists being passed around (so it'd be easier for them to get out of sync than it would be if they were both held in an instance of the recipe's class).
from bisect import bisect_left def insert(seq, keys, item, keyfunc=lambda v: v): """Insert an item into a sorted list using a separate corresponding sorted keys list and a keyfunc() to extract the key from each item. Based on insert() method in SortedCollection recipe: http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577197-sortedcollection/ """ k = keyfunc(item) # Get key. i = bisect_left(keys, k) # Determine where to insert item. keys.insert(i, k) # Insert key of item to keys list. seq.insert(i, item) # Insert the item itself in the corresponding place. # Initialize the sorted data and keys lists. data = [('red', 5), ('blue', 1), ('yellow', 8), ('black', 0)] data.sort(key=lambda r: r[1]) # Sort data by key value keys = [r[1] for r in data] # Initialize keys list print(data) # -> [('black', 0), ('blue', 1), ('red', 5), ('yellow', 8)] insert(data, keys, ('brown', 7), keyfunc=lambda x: x[1]) print(data) # -> [('black', 0), ('blue', 1), ('red', 5), ('brown', 7), ('yellow', 8)]
Follow-on question:
Can bisect.insort_left
be used?
No, you can't simply use the bisect.insort_left()
function to do this because it wasn't written in a way that supports a key-function—instead it just compares the whole item passed to it to insert, x
, with one of the whole items in the array in its if a[mid] < x:
statement. You can see what I mean by looking at the source for the bisect
module in Lib/bisect.py
.
Here's the relevant excerpt:
def insort_left(a, x, lo=0, hi=None): """Insert item x in list a, and keep it sorted assuming a is sorted. If x is already in a, insert it to the left of the leftmost x. Optional args lo (default 0) and hi (default len(a)) bound the slice of a to be searched. """ if lo < 0: raise ValueError('lo must be non-negative') if hi is None: hi = len(a) while lo < hi: mid = (lo+hi)//2 if a[mid] < x: lo = mid+1 else: hi = mid a.insert(lo, x)
You could modify the above to accept an optional key-function argument and use it:
def my_insort_left(a, x, lo=0, hi=None, keyfunc=lambda v: v): x_key = keyfunc(x) # Get comparison value. . . . if keyfunc(a[mid]) < x_key: # Compare key values. lo = mid+1 . . .
...and call it like this:
my_insort_left(data, ('brown', 7), keyfunc=lambda v: v[1])
Actually, if you're going to write a custom function, for the sake of more efficiency at the expense of unneeded generality, you could dispense with the adding of a generic key function argument and just hardcode everything to operate the way needed with the data format you have. This will avoid the overhead of repeated calls to a key-function while doing the insertions.
def my_insort_left(a, x, lo=0, hi=None): x_key = x[1] # Key on second element of each item in sequence. . . . if a[mid][1] < x_key: lo = mid+1 # Compare second element to key. . . .
...called this way without passing keyfunc:
my_insort_left(data, ('brown', 7))
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With