Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to Test for Memory Leaks?

We have an application with hundreds of possible user actions, and think about how enhancing memory leak testing.

Currently, here's the way it happens: When manually testing the software, if it appears that our application consumes too much memory, we use a memory tool, find the cause and fix it. It's a rather slow and not efficient process: the problems are discovered late and it relies on the good will of one developer.

How can we improve that?

  • Internally check that some actions (like "close file") do recover some memory and log it?
  • Assert on memory state inside our unit tests (but it seems this would be a tedious task) ?
  • Manually regularly check it from time to time?
  • Include that check each time a new user story is implemented?
like image 863
sthiers Avatar asked Jan 07 '09 14:01

sthiers


3 Answers

Which language?

I'd use a tool such as Valgrind, try to fully exercise the program and see what it reports.

like image 125
Draemon Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 00:09

Draemon


first line of defense:

  • check list with common memory allocation related errors for developers
  • coding guidelines

second line of defense:

  • code reviews
  • static code analyis (as a part of build process)
  • memory profiling tools

If you work with unmanaged language (like C/C++) you can efficiently discover most of the memory leaks by hijacking memory management functions. For example you can track all memory allocations/deallocations.

like image 44
aku Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 00:09

aku


It seems to me that the core of the problem is not so much finding memory leaks as knowing when to test for them. You say you have lots of user actions, but you don't say what sequences of user actions are meaningful. If you can generate meaningful sequences at random, I'd argue hard for random testing. On random tests you would measure

  • Code coverage (with gcov or valgrind)
  • Memory usage (with valgrind)
  • Coverage of the user actions themselves

By "coverage of user actions" I mean statements like the following:

  • For every pair of actions A and B, if there is a meaningful sequence of actions in which A is immediately followed by B, then we have tested such a sequence.

If that's not true, then you can ask for what fraction of pairs A and B it is true.

If you have the CPU cycles to afford it, you would probably also benefit from running valgrind or another memory-checking tool either before every commit to your source-code repository or during a nightly build.

Automate!

like image 25
Norman Ramsey Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 02:09

Norman Ramsey