I have managed to do this, but it does not look efficient:
var t reflect.Type
switch t {
case reflect.TypeOf(([]uint8)(nil)):
// handle []uint8 array type
}
Reflection is the ability of a program to introspect and analyze its structure during run-time. In Go language, reflection is primarily carried out with types. The reflect package offers all the required APIs/Methods for this purpose. Reflection is often termed as a method of metaprogramming.
The reflect. Indirect() Function in Golang is used to get the value that v points to, i.e., If v is a nil pointer, Indirect returns a zero Value. If v is not a pointer, Indirect returns v. To access this function, one needs to imports the reflect package in the program.
The reflect. ValueOf() Function in Golang is used to get the new Value initialized to the concrete value stored in the interface i. To access this function, one needs to imports the reflect package in the program.
First question, are you sure you want to switch on reflect.Type and not use a type switch? Example:
switch x := y.(type) {
case []uint8:
// x is now a []uint8
}
Assuming that will not work for your situation, my recommendation is to make those package variables. Example:
var uint8SliceType = reflect.TypeOf(([]uint8)(nil))
func Foo() {
var t reflect.Type
switch t {
case uint8SliceType:
// handle []uint8 array type
}
}
you may not need reflect if you are just trying to detect type.
switch t := myVar.(type){
case []uint8:
// t is []uint8
case *Foo:
// t is *Foo
default:
panic("unknown type")
}
What are you actually trying to accomplish?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With