This shows the gist of it:
#include <utility>
class A {
public:
A() { }
};
class B {
public:
B() { }
};
typedef std::pair<A*, B*> ABPair;
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
B* b = 0; // no C2440
ABPair p2(new A(), b);
ABPair p1(new A(), 0); // C2440
return 0;
}
Is there a better way to make the p1 declaration work than just forcing a cast, e.g.
ABPair p1(new A(), (B*)NULL)
? This seems like it would be pretty common & that there would be a "right" way to do it .. and that casting it is not the right way.
On VS 2010, here's the full error:
1>ClCompile:
1> test.cpp
1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 10.0\vc\include\utility(163): error C2440: 'initializing' : cannot convert from 'int' to 'B *'
1> Conversion from integral type to pointer type requires reinterpret_cast, C-style cast or function-style cast
1> c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 10.0\vc\include\utility(247) : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::_Pair_base<_Ty1,_Ty2>::_Pair_base<_Ty,int>(_Other1 &&,_Other2 &&)' being compiled
1> with
1> [
1> _Ty1=A *,
1> _Ty2=B *,
1> _Ty=A *,
1> _Other1=A *,
1> _Other2=int
1> ]
1> c:\users\charliearnold\documents\visual studio 2010\projects\test\test\test.cpp(20) : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2>::pair<A*,int>(_Other1 &&,_Other2 &&)' being compiled
1> with
1> [
1> _Ty1=A *,
1> _Ty2=B *,
1> _Other1=A *,
1> _Other2=int
1> ]
1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 10.0\vc\include\utility(163): error C2439: 'std::_Pair_base<_Ty1,_Ty2>::second' : member could not be initialized
1> with
1> [
1> _Ty1=A *,
1> _Ty2=B *
1> ]
1> c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 10.0\vc\include\utility(167) : see declaration of 'std::_Pair_base<_Ty1,_Ty2>::second'
1> with
1> [
1> _Ty1=A *,
1> _Ty2=B *
1> ]
1>
1>Build FAILED.
Not really. nullptr
will fix this in C++0x, but for now, write (B*)0
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With