Edit at the end
I have a function which takes a template:
template <template <typename ...> class P, typename ... Args>
void f(const P<Args...> &p)
{
std::cout << "Template with " << sizeof...(Args) << " parameters!\n";
}
It works pretty good with any kind of templates I've tested so far:
f(std::valarray<int>{}); // Prints: "Template with 1 parameters!"
f(std::pair<char, char>{}); // Prints: "Template with 2 parameters!"
f(std::set<float>{}); // Prints: "Template with 3 parameters!"
f(std::map<int, int>{}); // Prints: "Template with 4 parameters!"
But, let's suppose I want to specialize the template for when it takes a template with two parameters, the code below doesn't work:
template <>
void f<template <typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>(const P<A, B> &p)
{
std::cout << "Special case!\n";
}
parse error in template argument list
void f<template <typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>(const P<Args...> &p) { std::cout << "Template with " << sizeof...(Args) << " parameters!\n"; }
^
'P' does not name a type
void f<template <typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>(const P<Args...> &p) { std::cout << "Template with " << sizeof...(Args) << " parameters!\n"; }
^
expected ',' or '...' before '<' token
void f<template <typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>(const P<Args...> &p) { std::cout << "Template with " << sizeof...(Args) << " parameters!\n"; }
^
template-id 'f<<expression error> >' for 'void f(int)' does not match any template declaration
void f<template <typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>(const P<Args...> &p) { std::cout << "Template with " << sizeof...(Args) << " parameters!\n"; }
AFAIK it's pretty simple with the other types of template parameters:
// Type parameter
template <typename TYPE>
void f(TYPE) { std::cout << "Type!\n"; }
// Non-type parameter
template <int VALUE>
void f() { std::cout << "Value " << VALUE << "!\n"; }
// Type parameter specialization
template <>
void f(float) { std::cout << "Special type case!\n"; }
// Non-type parameter specialization
template <>
void f<666>() { static_assert(false, "Forbidden number!"); }
How can I achieve this functionality with template-template templates?
As pointed by orlp and angew function templates cannot be partially specialised, so I should stick to object templates, here is my attempt:
template <template <typename ...> class P, typename ... Args>
struct c
{
using type = P<Args...>;
const std::size_t count = sizeof...(Args);
void f(const type &t)
{
std::cout << "Template with " << sizeof...(Args) << " parameters!\n";
}
};
template <template <typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>
struct c<P, A, B>
{
using type = P<A, B>;
void f(const type &t)
{
std::cout << "Spezialized 2 parameters!\n";
}
};
It works:
c<std::valarray, int> c_valarray_int;
c<std::pair, int, char> c_pair_int_char;
c<std::vector, int, std::allocator<int>> c_vector_int;
c<std::map, int, int> c_map_int_int;
c_valarray_int.f({}); // Prints: "Template with 1 parameters!"
c_pair_int_char.f({}); // Prints: "Spezialized with 2 parameters!"
c_vector_int.f({}); // Prints: "Spezialized with 2 parameters!"
c_map_int_int.f({}); // Prints: "Template with 2 parameters!" (expected)
But now, I should specify all the parameters instead of let the compiler guess the whole thing, well... that's not a tragedy.
You're attempting partial specialisation of your function template—specialisation for any template with two template parameters. That is not allowed in C++. Function templates cannot be partially specialised.
Look at it another way: the explicit specialisations you've shown for tempalte type parameters and template non-type parameters use concrete arguments. To explicitly specialise your function template, you'd do something like this:
template <>
void f<std::pair, int, double>(const std::pair<int, double> &p)
{
std::cout << "Special case!\n";
}
In your original code, P
, A
and B
are still "unbound"—they're parameters, not arguments. An explicit specialisation cannot have template parameters; all template parameters of the primary template being specialised must be bound to concrete arguments provided by that specialisation.
To address your edit: you can still keep the function template interface with argument deduction, and simply forward the call to a (potentially partially specialised) class template, like this:
template <template <typename ...> class P, typename ... Args>
struct c
{
using type = P<Args...>;
static const std::size_t count = sizeof...(Args);
static void f(const type &t)
{
std::cout << "Template with " << sizeof...(Args) << " parameters!\n";
}
};
template <template <typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>
struct c<P, A, B>
{
using type = P<A, B>;
static void f(const type &t)
{
std::cout << "Spezialized 2 parameters!\n";
}
};
template <template <class ...> class P, class... Args>
void f(const P<Args...> &t)
{
c<P, Args...>::f(t);
}
[Live example]
Well, the proper syntax for doing what you're trying to do is this:
template <template<typename, typename> class P, typename A, typename B>
void f<P, A, B>(const P<A, B> &p) {
std::cout << "Special case!\n";
}
However, this is partial specialization, which is not allowed on functions. You can turn your function into a class with a static method though, and use a wrapper function calling the static method of the class.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With