I want to skip a line in C, the line x=1;
in the main section using bufferoverflow
; however, I don't know why I can not skip the address from 4002f4
to the next address 4002fb
in spite of the fact that I am counting 7 bytes form <main+35>
to <main+42>
.
I also have configured the options the randomniZation and execstack environment in a Debian and AMD environment, but I am still getting x=1;
. What it's wrong with this procedure?
I have used dba to debug the stack and the memory addresses:
0x00000000004002ef <main+30>: callq 0x4002a4 **<function>**
**0x00000000004002f4** <main+35>: movl $0x1,-0x4(%rbp)
**0x00000000004002fb** <main+42>: mov -0x4(%rbp),%esi
0x00000000004002fe <main+45>: mov $0x4629c4,%edi
void function(int a, int b, int c)
{
char buffer[5];
int *ret;
ret = buffer + 12;
(*ret) += 8;
}
int main()
{
int x = 0;
function(1, 2, 3);
x = 1;
printf("x = %i \n", x);
return 0;
}
The newline character ( \n ) is called an escape sequence, and it forces the cursor to change its position to the beginning of the next line on the screen. This results in a new line.
To bulk up enterprise defenses, ensure secure coding practices, and prevent buffer overflow vulnerabilities by adhering to the following: Choose programming language wisely. Certain programming languages, such as C and C++, are prone to buffer overflows as they have no built-in protections against them.
A buffer overflow occurs when data written to a buffer also corrupts data values in memory addresses adjacent to the destination buffer due to insufficient bounds checking. This can occur when copying data from one buffer to another without first checking that the data fits within the destination buffer.
That is why the safest basic method in C is to avoid the following five unsafe functions that can lead to a buffer overflow vulnerability: printf , sprintf , strcat , strcpy , and gets . Unfortunately, the base C language provides only one safe alternative: fgets (to be used instead of gets ).
You must be reading Smashing the Stack for Fun and Profit article. I was reading the same article and have found the same problem it wasnt skipping that instruction. After a few hours debug session in IDA I have changed the code like below and it is printing x=0 and b=5.
#include <stdio.h>
void function(int a, int b) {
int c=0;
int* pointer;
pointer =&c+2;
(*pointer)+=8;
}
void main() {
int x =0;
function(1,2);
x = 3;
int b =5;
printf("x=%d\n, b=%d\n",x,b);
getch();
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With