From the new CosmosDb emulator I got sort of a repository to perform basic documentdb operations, this repository gets injected to other classes. I wanted to unit test a basic query.
public class DocumentDBRepository<T> where T : class { //Details ommited... public IQueryable<T> GetQueryable() { return _client.CreateDocumentQuery<T>( UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri(_databaseId, _collectionId), new FeedOptions { MaxItemCount = -1, EnableCrossPartitionQuery = true }); } public async Task<IEnumerable<T>> ExecuteQueryAsync(IQueryable<T> query) { IDocumentQuery<T> documentQuery = query.AsDocumentQuery(); List<T> results = new List<T>(); while (documentQuery.HasMoreResults) { results.AddRange(await documentQuery.ExecuteNextAsync<T>()); } return results; } }
This repository needs a document client to work, which also gets injected on the constructor.
public DocumentDBRepository(string databaseId, IDocumentClient client) { _client = client; _databaseId = databaseId; _collectionId = GetCollectionName(); }
My initial approach was to use the CosmosDb emulator, but that required the emulator to run which I don't like and makes the tests slower.
My second approach was to try and use a mock of the document client.
var data = new List<MyDocumentClass> { new MyDocumentClass{ Description= "BBB" }, new MyDocumentClass{ Description= "ZZZ" }, } .AsQueryable() .OrderBy(q => q.Description); var client = new Mock<IDocumentClient>(); client.As<IDocumentClient>() .Setup(foo => foo.CreateDocumentQuery<MyDocumentClass>(It.IsAny<Uri>(), It.IsAny<FeedOptions>())) .Returns(data); DocumentDBRepository<MyDocumentClass> repo= new DocumentDBRepository<MyDocumentClass>(cosmosDatabase, client.Object);
The code that uses this repository works like this:
var query = _documentsRepository.GetQueryable() .Where(d => d.Description = description) .OrderByDescending(d => d.description) .Take(100); //Execute query async fails. var result = await _documentsRepository.ExecuteQueryAsync(query);
It fails because the repository tries to convert the IQueryable
to a IDocumentQuery
object, which is very specific to DocumentDb api (See method ExecuteQueryAsync
above). Later on, it executes HasMoreResults
method on it. So the problem is, even if I mock .asDocumentQuery()
to return my object, I don't know how to provide a result for HasMoreResults
and ExecuteNextAsync
so that it makes sense for my unit tests.
My third option would be to straight mock my repository instead of the DocumentClient object. Would be, I think, simpler, but I wouldn't be testing much of the DocumentDb api.
I’m here to assert that creating mock database abstractions to write unit tests is almost always a bad idea. I work on a lot of RESTful Go API servers, and I do my best to write small testable functions so I don’t have to write useless mocking logic.
There are ways to mock it but you can simply go around that and create a fake implementation of a Repository and UnitOfWork to use in your tests. If you go the extra mile and create a viable mock for a DataContext then you shouldn't create mocks for your Repository and UnitOfWork.
The mock database code is unused in production. We are testing code that literally doesn’t matter. We technically have better “test coverage” with this approach, but our tests aren’t actually any more robust. We get a false sense of security. We have made the real code harder to find by abstracting it behind an interface.
Only the Repository and UnitOfWork classes themselves (the ones that contain the actual database connection) would need a real database to be unit-tested and if their implementation is simple enough, you can even choose to defer testing of those classes till the integration or end-to-end tests.
The key to this is that the CreateDocumentQuery
you are calling, though shown as returning IOrderedQueryable
, the encapsulated result will also be derived from IDocumentQuery
which is what would allow .AsDocumentQuery()
to work.
Now normally you should not be mocking what you do not own. However in this case if you want to exercise ExecuteQueryAsync
to completion you can create a fake abstraction that will allow the test to be exercised to completion.
The following Example shows how it can be done.
[TestClass] public class DocumentDBRepositoryShould { /// <summary> /// Fake IOrderedQueryable IDocumentQuery for mocking purposes /// </summary> public interface IFakeDocumentQuery<T> : IDocumentQuery<T>, IOrderedQueryable<T> { } [TestMethod] public async Task ExecuteQueryAsync() { //Arrange var description = "BBB"; var expected = new List<MyDocumentClass> { new MyDocumentClass{ Description = description }, new MyDocumentClass{ Description = "ZZZ" }, new MyDocumentClass{ Description = "AAA" }, new MyDocumentClass{ Description = "CCC" }, }; var response = new FeedResponse<MyDocumentClass>(expected); var mockDocumentQuery = new Mock<IFakeDocumentQuery<MyDocumentClass>>(); mockDocumentQuery .SetupSequence(_ => _.HasMoreResults) .Returns(true) .Returns(false); mockDocumentQuery .Setup(_ => _.ExecuteNextAsync<MyDocumentClass>(It.IsAny<CancellationToken>())) .ReturnsAsync(response); var client = new Mock<IDocumentClient>(); client .Setup(_ => _.CreateDocumentQuery<MyDocumentClass>(It.IsAny<Uri>(), It.IsAny<FeedOptions>())) .Returns(mockDocumentQuery.Object); var cosmosDatabase = string.Empty; var documentsRepository = new DocumentDBRepository<MyDocumentClass>(cosmosDatabase, client.Object); //Act var query = documentsRepository.GetQueryable(); //Simple query. var actual = await documentsRepository.ExecuteQueryAsync(query); //Assert actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected); } }
Here is Nkosi's answer ported to NSubstitute:
[TestClass] public class DocumentDBRepositoryShould { [TestMethod] public async Task ExecuteQueryAsync() { // Arrange var description = "BBB"; var expected = new List<MyDocumentClass> { new MyDocumentClass{ Description = description }, new MyDocumentClass{ Description = "ZZZ" }, new MyDocumentClass{ Description = "AAA" }, new MyDocumentClass{ Description = "CCC" }, }; var response = new FeedResponse<MyDocumentClass>(expected); var mockDocumentQuery = Substitute.For<IFakeDocumentQuery<MyDocumentClass>>(); mockDocumentQuery.HasMoreResults.Returns(true, false); mockDocumentQuery.ExecuteNextAsync<MyDocumentClass>(Arg.Any<CancellationToken>()) .Returns(Task.FromResult(response)); var client = Substitute.For<IDocumentClient>(); client.CreateDocumentQuery<MyDocumentClass>(Arg.Any<Uri>(), Arg.Any<FeedOptions>()) .ReturnsForAnyArgs(mockDocumentQuery); var cosmosDatabase = string.Empty; var documentsRepository = new DocumentDBRepository<MyDocumentClass>(cosmosDatabase, client); //Act var actual = await documentsRepository.GetDataAsync(); //Simple query. //Assert actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected); } public class MyDocumentClass { public string Description { get; set; } } public interface IFakeDocumentQuery<T> : IDocumentQuery<T>, IOrderedQueryable<T> { } public class DocumentDBRepository<T> { private readonly string cosmosDatabase; private readonly IDocumentClient documentClient; public DocumentDBRepository(string cosmosDatabase, IDocumentClient documentClient) { this.cosmosDatabase = cosmosDatabase; this.documentClient = documentClient; } public async Task<IEnumerable<MyDocumentClass>> GetDataAsync() { var documentUri = UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri(cosmosDatabase, "test-collection"); var query = documentClient .CreateDocumentQuery<MyDocumentClass>(documentUri) .AsDocumentQuery(); var list = new List<MyDocumentClass>(); while (query.HasMoreResults) { var rules = await query.ExecuteNextAsync<MyDocumentClass>(); list.AddRange(rules); } return list; } } }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With