I was wondering what would be the best practice to share common libraries and own modules between multiple angularJS projects.
Let's assume that I'm working on two different projects. Both rely on libraries like angularJS, bootstrap etc.
I have a file structure like below:
- Project 1
- index.html
- css
- js
- module A
- module B
- lib
- angular
- bootstrap
- Project 2
- index.html
- css
- js
- module B
- module X
- lib
- angular
- bootstrap
So I was thinking about just creating another directory with all the shared components so that I get sth. like:
- Shared
- angular
- bootstrap
- module B
- Project 1
- index.html
- css
- js
- module A
- Project 2
- index.html
- css
- js
- module X
I have module B written like:
angular.module("moduleB", [])
.service("SB", [function () {/*functionality here*/}]);
.factory("FB", [function () {/*functionality here*/}]);
and would then include it in my Project 1/2 as dependency like:
angular.module("project1", ["moduleB"]);
to achieve this approach.
Would that be the best way? What could be an alternative?
To get started, go ahead and install bit-cli, then head over to the project from which to share the components, and initialize a bit workspace. Then, head over to bit. dev and create a free account. Then, create a collection to host your shared components.
Yes, you can define multiple modules in angularJS as given below. The modularization in AngularJS helps us to keep the code clarity and easy to understand, as we can combine multiple modules to generate the application.
Scaffolding in Visual Studio allows you to generate a component that contains a DevExtreme UI component and a data service for the UI component. You can scaffold the DataGrid, TreeList, and Form.
You can do it that way, but it may give you headaches if you ever want Project 1 and Project 2 to use two different versions of the Shared components. Imagine that you need to release Project 1 with the latest shared components, but Project 2 still relies on a previous version of the shared components. What a mess. Some other options:
The second option has a lot of moving parts and requires changes to your applications, not to mention the inability to deploy different versions of the shared code in each project. The first has the benefit of being easy to slice into 3 repositories: Project 1, Project 2, and Shared. If Shared is a Bower dependency in Project 1 and Project 2, a simple bower update
will get you the latest version in either project. Or you can lock a project to particular versions of Shared.
Option 3 seems like it gives you the most control, but you will quickly lose track of which version of Shared your project is using. Option 1 solves that.
Another potential option is to publish your shared code as npm modules. If the code is private then you can use npm Private Modules for that, although there is a cost for using private modules.
With either this or the Bower approach described in d.jamison's answer try to break your modules into smaller modules based on their specific purposes, rather than having big monolithic "AllOurSharedCode" modules.
The benefit of that is that if you find a bug, or make an improvement, you can see more easily exactly which of your projects may be affected. The require
or ES2015 import
syntax help a lot with that too as you will be saying e.g. import { calculateLineTotal } from OrderLogic.js
, so it is then trivial to find all of the places in code that a change to the calculateLineTotal
would impact.
Or just do...
"dependencies" : {
"shared-code" : "git://github.com/user/shared-code.git",
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With