Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to set time limit on raw_input

Tags:

in python, is there a way to, while waiting for a user input, count time so that after, say 30 seconds, the raw_input() function is automatically skipped?

like image 837
calccrypto Avatar asked May 29 '10 01:05

calccrypto


People also ask

How do you limit input time in python?

timedInput() timedInput() works similar to Python's default input() - function, asking user for a string of text, but timedInput() allows you to define an amount of time the user has to enter any text or how many consecutive seconds to wait for input, if the user goes idle.

How do you make a timeout in Python?

Then it's as simple as this to timeout a test or any function you like: @timeout(5.0) # if execution takes longer than 5 seconds, raise a TimeoutError def test_base_regression(self): ... Be careful since this does not terminate the function after timeout is reached!

What is the difference between input () and raw_input ()?

Basically, the difference between raw_input and input is that the return type of raw_input is always string, while the return type of input need not be string only. Python will judge as to what data type will it fit the best. In case you have entered a number, it will take it as an integer.

What does the Python raw_input () function do?

Python raw_input function is used to get the values from the user. We call this function to tell the program to stop and wait for the user to input the values.


1 Answers

The signal.alarm function, on which @jer's recommended solution is based, is unfortunately Unix-only. If you need a cross-platform or Windows-specific solution, you can base it on threading.Timer instead, using thread.interrupt_main to send a KeyboardInterrupt to the main thread from the timer thread. I.e.:

import thread import threading  def raw_input_with_timeout(prompt, timeout=30.0):     print(prompt, end=' ')         timer = threading.Timer(timeout, thread.interrupt_main)     astring = None     try:         timer.start()         astring = input(prompt)     except KeyboardInterrupt:         pass     timer.cancel()     return astring 

this will return None whether the 30 seconds time out or the user explicitly decides to hit control-C to give up on inputting anything, but it seems OK to treat the two cases in the same way (if you need to distinguish, you could use for the timer a function of your own that, before interrupting the main thread, records somewhere the fact that a timeout has happened, and in your handler for KeyboardInterrupt access that "somewhere" to discriminate which of the two cases occurred).

Edit: I could have sworn this was working but I must have been wrong -- the code above omits the obviously-needed timer.start(), and even with it I can't make it work any more. select.select would be the obvious other thing to try but it won't work on a "normal file" (including stdin) in Windows -- in Unix it works on all files, in Windows, only on sockets.

So I don't know how to do a cross-platform "raw input with timeout". A windows-specific one can be constructed with a tight loop polling msvcrt.kbhit, performing a msvcrt.getche (and checking if it's a return to indicate the output's done, in which case it breaks out of the loop, otherwise accumulates and keeps waiting) and checking the time to time out if needed. I cannot test because I have no Windows machine (they're all Macs and Linux ones), but here the untested code I would suggest:

import msvcrt import time  def raw_input_with_timeout(prompt, timeout=30.0):     print(prompt, end=' ')         finishat = time.time() + timeout     result = []     while True:         if msvcrt.kbhit():             result.append(msvcrt.getche())             if result[-1] == '\r':   # or \n, whatever Win returns;-)                 return ''.join(result)             time.sleep(0.1)          # just to yield to other processes/threads         else:             if time.time() > finishat:                 return None 

The OP in a comment says he does not want to return None upon timeout, but what's the alternative? Raising an exception? Returning a different default value? Whatever alternative he wants he can clearly put it in place of my return None;-).

If you don't want to time out just because the user is typing slowly (as opposed to, not typing at all!-), you could recompute finishat after every successful character input.

like image 152
Alex Martelli Avatar answered Sep 23 '22 09:09

Alex Martelli