This may be a stupid question, but I'm new to using Docker-compose. So far, I love it... but I'm having some long build times. I have a project with several dependencies, and I need to obviously rebuild the source every time I make a change. Right now, I'm calling docker-compose build
to rebuild the container, followed by a docker-compose up
. The problem is:
It's rebuilding the entire container for every change I make to the source code (which takes a long time -- fetching dependencies/etc). This is significantly slowing me down.
I really feel like I should just be able to run a command on the container to rebuild and then re-run the executable, like-so:
docker-compose run web go build . docker-compose run web ./appor
docker-compose run web go build . docker-compose restartThis should work because I'm using a volume to share code amongst the host and container. There shouldn't be a need to refetch all the dependencies. Shouldn't it use the freshly built executable? However, this does not reflect the built changes and port forwarding appears to break.
For reference, here is my Dockerfile:
FROM golang:1.8
COPY . /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
RUN echo $PATH
RUN go get -d -v ./...
RUN go install -v ./...
RUN go build -o test1 .
CMD ["test1"]
EXPOSE 3470
And my docker-compose.yml file:
version: '3'
services:
postgres:
image: postgres
volumes:
- ./db/data/psql:/var/lib/postgresql/data
- ./db/schema:/db/schema
redis:
image: redis
volumes:
- ./db/data/redis:/data
server:
build: .
command: test1
volumes:
- .:/go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
ports:
- "3470:3470"
depends_on:
- postgres
- redis
Is there something I'm missing?
And if you want to improve your Docker impl, you can make a smaller image. I suggest "multi-stage builds" to do that
The image size for this build is like 600mb
FROM golang:1.8
RUN go get -d -v ./...
RUN go install -v ./...
COPY . /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
RUN echo $PATH
RUN go build -o test1 .
CMD ["test1"]
EXPOSE 3470
Using multi-stage builds, the image weight is the size of the binary and a scratch
FROM golang:1.8 as builder
RUN go get -d -v ./...
RUN go install -v ./...
COPY . /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
RUN echo $PATH
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -o test1 .
FROM alpine:latest
RUN apk --no-cache add ca-certificates
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/
COPY --from=builder /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1 .
CMD ["test1"]
EXPOSE 3470
Using multi-stage builds you are using a heavy image for build the app and another really smaller for run your app.
You have asked a good question.
The command's order in the Dockerfile really matters. Put first the things that don't change frequently, and later those that are most likely to change in every build:
FROM golang:1.8
RUN go get -d -v ./...
RUN go install -v ./...
COPY . /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/codeblooded/test1
RUN echo $PATH
RUN go build -o test1 .
CMD ["test1"]
EXPOSE 3470
When a layer change regarding the previous build, docker discards the following cached layers and runs them again, sometimes wasting your time.
Pay attention to the "Using cache" sentence that docker outputs in each layer that is re-used from the previous build.
Another recommendation, for your dev work, use fresh to re-build your go app automatically every time you change the code. Just install it in the container and simply using command: fresh
in your docker-compose.yml
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With