We have been using a web application framework to build apps that need to be able to query a SQL Server database and get the results as XML.
In the past, the framework provided that capability. But that capability is now deprecated.
So we were thinking, the framework allows us to easily query a REST service over HTTP, so why not use a SQL Server HTTP Endpoint. However, we then read that HTTP Endpoints are deprecated, as of SQL Server 2008. Not a platform on which to design an architecture for the future.
Azure (formerly SQL Data Services) was going to offer similar services, but now only supports the TDS protocol, not http. So no REST to be found in Azure.
The suggested alternative is to develop a custom app using WCF Data Services (formerly ADO.NET Data Services). But that would mean a whole additional app to develop, deploy, and maintain, presumably with its own authentication setup separate from SQL Server's, and its own source code repository... using a technology we have no experience with, therefore with its own pretty deep learning curve.
Can you suggest any other way to query a SQL Server database via REST/HTTP, that is not deprecated, and that would return results as XML?
Thanks for any help.
Another option is something like Dreamfactory. They have a SOAP to REST solution that allows you to connect to any database or service. I have used their free hosted solution in the past for projects. They also have an open source solution available. The cool thing about the service is that they use Swagger 3.0 to create service definitions in a nice front-end solution so you can test and create new endpoints.
I have used the OpenAPI 3.0 definitions to connect to 3rd party SOAP and REST services as well. They also support stored procedures and server-side scripting in the SQL Server environments.
Anyways, might be another option for you.
Read here: Creating an OData API for StackOverflow including XML and JSON in 30 minutes. Basically, the road forward is for REST to be offered by app layer (WCF powering EF that provides the OData mapping). IMHO straight HTTP access into the engine was a very bad idea to start with, nobody liked the HTTPEndpoints of SQL Server 2005 and they were as misguided as it gets. One cannot map the HTTP error model, security, type system into SQL and expect a smooth interoperability. Having the HTTP layer live in a dedicated app pushes the responsibility of handling the HTTP ecosystem into a component specialized in that (WCF), and the logic of mapping the REST model to the DB model ina component specialized in that job (EF).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With