I'm using the docopt implementation for R. My script has a command line option where the short form is -g
. When I run my script, it seems this argument is first interpreted by R and then by my script. Therefore I get a wrist slap about not specifying a value for the GUI. Can I prevent R from trying to work with these command line args?
Example of a script:
#!/usr/bin/Rscript
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(docopt))
"docopt practice script
Usage: foo.R [-g <goodies>]
Options:
-g <goodies>, --goodies=<goodies> Goodies
" -> doc
opts <- docopt(doc)
cat(sprintf("goodies = %s\n", opts$goodies))
Here's what happens when I run it:
Jennifers-MacBook-Pro-3:scripts jenny$ ./foo.R -g donuts
WARNING: --gui or -g without value ignored
goodies = donuts
If you change the short form of the option from -g
to -j
, the WARNING
goes away … but I have a good reason for using the letter g
!
As pointed out by @krlmlr, this issue has to do with Rscript
(in your hash bang). One workaround would be to use the functionality provided by the excellent littler in place of Rscript
. For example, using #!/usr/bin/Rscript
in foo.R
, I get the issue:
[nathan@nrussell R]$ ./foo.R -g donuts
WARNING: unknown gui 'donuts', using X11
goodies = donuts
Replacing this with #!/usr/local/bin/r
in a new script foo2.R
, I get a clean output:
[nathan@nrussell R]$ ./foo2.R -g donuts
goodies = donuts
It looks like you're on an OS X machine, so if you do choose to install littler
, just be sure to note the authors' warning:
On OS X, you may want to build it via configure --program-prefix="l" to renamed it to lr as that particular OS thinks R and r are the same
The R
and Rscript
commands know --args
. Compare the output of the following:
R -e "TRUE" --args --silent
R -e "TRUE" --silent
This works due to an early exit if --args
is detected. However, the --gui
warning is triggered in a separate loop before this.
This means that
Rscript -e "commandArgs()" --args --gui
will work but give the spurious warning, and
Rscript -e "commandArgs()" --gui
gives an error right away. It looks like only --gui
and -g
are affected.
As a quick-and-dirty hack, one could insert something like
if(!strcmp(*avv, "--args")) {
break;
}
at the beginning of the GUI-check loop. Until this is changed in R, I suspect there's no choice but to avoid the -g
switch or live with the (otherwise harmless) warning.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With